PCEngineFans.com - The PC Engine and TurboGrafx-16 Community Forum
Non-NEC Console Related Discussion => Chit-Chat => Topic started by: MotherGunner on January 20, 2012, 11:56:25 AM
Title: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: MotherGunner on January 20, 2012, 11:56:25 AM
Feel free to pit two persons/characters together to see who would win and discuss.
Air Zonk Vs. Astro Boy
Though similar in body frame and skills, I believe Zonk would rip Astro's heart out right out of the gate. Plus he would talk shit about Astro's dad, causing him to cry.
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: SignOfZeta on January 20, 2012, 04:13:01 PM
Plastic Man.
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: esteban on January 20, 2012, 10:09:48 PM
First, I have to say that I love the juxtaposition of these two images. Has anyone discussed/shown this before? I never realized the connection between the two. AWESOME. :)
Feel free to pit two persons/characters together to see who would win and discuss.
Air Zonk Vs. Astro Boy
Though similar in body frame and skills, I believe Zonk would rip Astro's heart out right out of the gate. Plus he would talk shit about Astro's dad, causing him to cry.
Seriously though, you may not realise it, but a real conundrum would be Superman vs. The Incredible Hulk! Most people choose Superman. Problem is, there is no known limit to the Hulk's strength! The madder he gets, the stronger he gets. Basically, I think Sup's would have to take him out real quick before he get's too pissed off! Ofcoase, then there's Superman vs. Captain Marvel(DC) vs. Captain Marvel(Marvel)! They're all around the same strength all the time.
And for pics sake DC's Captain Marvel (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/d4/Captainmarvel.JPG)
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: HercTNT on January 22, 2012, 12:46:02 PM
I always thought astroboy was a megaman wannabee. this is were your gonna tell me that astro boy came first right? I dont mean that sarcastically either. i was not familiar with astroboy until the release of the recent movie, so i have no idea who came first. I dont think Zonk could take him one on one, but the flying cow will come to zonks aid and milk him to death.
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: SignOfZeta on January 22, 2012, 06:26:35 PM
You guys are kidding right? The Astroboy TV show was on American TV 50 years ago, the manga was 60 years ago. It's influenced dozens of other creations. Megaman and Zonk are just the most obvious.
Seriously, Astro Boy is super f*cking awesome. That new bullshit Ridiculius Cage movie can take a flying f*ck at the moon, but the original manga is pure gold. Some of the best science fiction ideas of the 60s and 70s are in those little books.
I also recommend the GBA game. It's one the best games on the system.
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: MotherGunner on January 22, 2012, 07:41:16 PM
My mom grew up on Astro Boy. Tezuka was definitely ahead of his time. I would put him up there with the likes of Ray Bradbury.
Btw wasn't the GBA game based off the Cage movie?
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: ParanoiaDragon on January 22, 2012, 07:53:22 PM
Yeah, IIRC, my oldest brother grew up with Astro Boy, he's 48, so he's probably old enough to remember him. Astro Boy is oolllllllllld baby!
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: SignOfZeta on January 22, 2012, 08:33:07 PM
No, its based on the TV series that came out in the early 2000s. The same is true of the PS2 game, which is nothing special. The GBA game is f*cking magic though. I have both the US and JP versions and have beat it about eight times between them. BTW, aside from the (typically) shitty box, the US version is the better version.
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: MotherGunner on January 23, 2012, 03:46:58 AM
Cool, yea for a while the Astro Boy toys were in the clearance bin at Toys R Us. My mom came in and snathched them all up. I also got her the early 2000's show you mentioned on DVD compilation. It's the blackbox version IIRC. Oddly enough, the whole thing has spanish language audio that was pretty impressive (not that it would have mattered since my mom is bilingual).
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: SignOfZeta on January 23, 2012, 05:25:33 AM
I saw a bit of that show on TV and it was very cool looking. The problem for me though was that they don't have a Japanese audio option on the US releases. They also replaced all the music. Therefore I've been waiting for a re-release...might be waiting for a while on that one now that the entire US anime industry is collapsing...:)
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: MotherGunner on January 23, 2012, 05:30:03 AM
A damn shame too. I always really wanted to get into Hajime No Ippo myself. But I don't know of any U.S. releases.
Another favorite of mine was Honeybee Hutch and Ulysses 31. Classics.
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: HercTNT on January 23, 2012, 05:50:57 AM
Sorry, i grew up watching anime and old godzilla movies and i have never heard of astroboy. I'm a military brat to and have damn near lived or been threw every state in the union.
Well i stand corrected!!! My wife who is 5 years younger than me has informed me she knows of astroboy and used to watch him. I'm 35 shes 30 so go figure. thats what i get for living in podunk usa every place i moved i guess!
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: SignOfZeta on January 23, 2012, 10:28:42 AM
A damn shame too. I always really wanted to get into Hajime No Ippo myself. But I don't know of any U.S. releases.
Another favorite of mine was Honeybee Hutch and Ulysses 31. Classics.
I would kill for Ulysses 31, but I'm not sure that is ever going to happen. I think it never even came out on video in Japan, not even during the huge LD boom of the early 90s when seemingly every f*cking thing ever was coming out. It *may* have been released in Europe...in French...on PAL VHS. :(
The good news is that Mysterious Cities of Gold is out on video in English and in French. It's even on Netflix Instant. This is a case where interest in the show in foreign markets saved it. The same is true of Golion.
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: MotherGunner on January 23, 2012, 04:52:58 PM
Man, I LOVE Mysterious Cities of Gold! Yes Ulysses 31 was released on DVD in French. Wow, awesome to know someone who not only knows about it but likes it! Good times.
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: Shrapnoid on January 30, 2012, 03:40:30 AM
According to an old article I read in a gaming mag (I forget which mag), Capcom was going to bring Astroboy to the Famicom but, there ended up being some sort of disagreement between CC and the owners of Astro so, they came up with Rockman (Megaman in the U.S.) instead.
That may just be a rumor but, it's really hard to say with all of the changes that are made to games and stories during the development stages.
EDIT: Air Zonk has power, sure but, Astro is extremely durable by comparison and his over-all strength is measured in horse power which numbers up to ridiculous amounts so, Astro would most likely be the winner of that one. I don't think that Mega Man could take him on either and MM is my all-time favorite game character.
Now here would be an interesting fight...
8-Man vs Zero
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: TR0N on January 31, 2012, 07:02:11 PM
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: ProfessorProfessorson on February 06, 2012, 11:03:14 AM
Classic Kirk wouldn't need anyone else to mop the floor with them. JJ Abrams envisioned Kirk however, well, without a team he'd prob end up as rape bait.
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: MotherGunner on February 06, 2012, 12:21:49 PM
Ha ha ha!
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: HercTNT on February 06, 2012, 12:24:51 PM
The wiggles vs star trek :clap: You have no idea how many hours of the wiggles my kids have made me watch with them. I would give my left nut to science just to see kirk pound them out one by one.
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: MotherGunner on February 06, 2012, 12:28:03 PM
The wiggles vs star trek :clap: You have no idea how many hours of the wiggles my kids have made me watch with them. I would give my left nut to science just to see kirk pound them out one by one.
Filmations ghostbusters was utter garbage and should have never made it to the tv.
Except that it was based on a live action series that predates the REAL Ghostbusters by almost a decade. If people can look at it without "this rips off the REAL Ghostbusters it's not to bad.
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: HercTNT on February 07, 2012, 02:36:51 PM
yes i'm aware it predates it. thats why the ghostbusters had to change their name to the real ghostbusters. I never said it was a rip off, i just said it sucked.
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: MotherGunner on February 07, 2012, 05:22:34 PM
You have to admit it was a catchy song though! "Let's go ghostbuuuusters, let's go. LET'S GO!"
Speaking of catchy tunes (from toons) remember this?
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: esteban on February 07, 2012, 05:51:14 PM
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: MotherGunner on February 09, 2012, 06:37:10 PM
Voltron would win against FAT Iron Man 28, but would lose against Iron Man 28 (Go).(http://www.internationalhero.co.uk/t/tetsujingo.jpg) Either way, mostly likely Mazinger Z would kick all their asses when the pink chick-robot (Aphrodite) with her boob rockets distracts them all.
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: VenomMacbeth on February 09, 2012, 07:36:31 PM
Personally, I think Samus would turn MC into a steaming pile of hamburger seeping out of his armor. :/ Plus, she has boobs. Boobs always win.
You mean this ?
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: HercTNT on February 12, 2012, 07:34:07 PM
WOW!!! Someones living out there fantasy!! Since when is Samus a lesbian asian jedi knight! :shock:
Sorry Nectarsis, i will try to pick up the slack. So many Bruce lee movies, so little time :D
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: RegalSin on February 13, 2012, 01:09:39 AM
For me Halo is just one big advertisment to get people to jion the military and die for something that will never end. If Halo was great they would have made the AI insanely hard.
How about Halo vs Malice?
Quote
This black guy would always win. (Even today)
Nope, too cocky to win. Didn't he get killed in a room of laughing girls, in that film.
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: geise on February 13, 2012, 01:23:00 AM
RegalSin you are wrong!!!!! Military is only there to provide practice for skills that can be used for video gaming!
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: nectarsis on February 13, 2012, 03:06:50 AM
Master Chief is a joke compared to Samus. If Samus was the main character of that thing "In her suit" she would totaly own that game and every single other FPS game.
Bomberman owns Master Chief
Portal owns Master Cheif
The Freeman owns Master Cheif
Bart Simpson owns Master Cheif
Halo is just one big advertisment to get people to jion the military and die for something that will never end. If Halo was smart they would have made the AI insanely hard.
Quote
This black guy would always win. (Even today)
Nope, too cocky to win. Didn't he get killed in a room of laughing girls, in that film.
Although I rather enjoy Halo, I agree. Especially with the part about The Freeman. :lol:
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: SignOfZeta on February 13, 2012, 03:38:22 AM
The next person who brings up that Halo bullshit gets banned.
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: VenomMacbeth on February 13, 2012, 04:02:48 AM
Hey, guess what? Halo. :dance:
[EDIT:] oh, and, SHENANIGANS!!
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: MotherGunner on February 13, 2012, 04:15:13 AM
Halo is just one big advertisment to get people to join the military and die for something that will never end.
I beg to differ. The Revolutionary, 1812, Civil, Spanish-American, WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, Desert Storm (to name a few U.S. wars DID eventually end. Not to mention some countless wars around the world).
Even the frakking war with the Cylons ended. Who knows, maybe your life-long dream of Picard shaking hands with the Borg Queen in peace will come true and you (just maybe) will cream your yellow whities and fog your glasses as you fap to it.
Halo is just one big advertisment to get people to join the military and die for something that will never end.
I beg to differ. The Revolutionary, 1812, Civil, Spanish-American, WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, Desert Storm (to name a few U.S. wars DID eventually end. Not to mention some countless wars around the world).
Even the frakking war with the Cylons ended. Who knows, maybe your life-long dream of Picard shaking hands with the Borg Queen in peace will come true and you (just maybe) will cream your yellow whities and fog your glasses as you fap to it.
I believe he was trying to say that war itself never ends. :/
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: MotherGunner on February 13, 2012, 04:56:42 AM
It is true "War" itself never ends. My comment was based more on how it must be nice having the luxury of throwing out an "opinion" like that from a place of personal safety, when I have a brother who just demobilized, and we still have countless brothers and sisters in uniform (from many countries) still out there.
Shit like this really irritates me; When people generalize or make a stupid comment about the military and 9 times out of 10, they don't have the balls to put on a uniform themselves and their qualification to add an opinion is void. That's why I don't talk about shit I don't know about. I get that people put on a uniform so that morons can say moronic-fantastic things but still. You know?
Not everyone joins the military because of a f*cking video game. Wisen up.
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: SignOfZeta on February 13, 2012, 09:12:13 AM
The term "endless war" is used because that's pretty much what it is. The war in Korea didn't end at all, it just moved to Viet Nam. The war against communists didn't end, it just became the war on terrorism. "The enemy" is always there, even when they obviously aren't.
War itself on Earth will end, eventually. It has to. Either we'll blow ourselves up permanently, or we'll learn that having "the balls" to do whatever The Man tells you to leads to nothing but more war. Ether way, it will end.
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: MotherGunner on February 13, 2012, 10:07:06 AM
Zeta, you are also going off of one premise or opinion that anyone who joins the military does so just so they can go and fight a war or for the specific purpose of having "The Man" tell them what to do. Definitley not true in my experience as a veteran myself. When I said having "the balls" I meant it in that specific context above. Certainly it takes balls to say, NOT go and join the military and get into college instead, you know, better yourself and make a family? Not sure what you were trying to do by twisting my words like that but whatever, it's your opinion and thankfully we live in a society where people can say whatever they want. While you are also generalizing, thankfully, you can at least articulate it better than most so I will give you that. The goal here was not to debate war but point out the unintelligent generalization from Regal.
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: RegalSin on February 13, 2012, 10:09:26 AM
OKay okay, Halo is a reasonable character. Considering it was adopted by a company that is known for it's blue screen of death.
Quote
Simply parrot the bullshit you see on the mainstream media from a few bad apples who went crazy...
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: MotherGunner on February 13, 2012, 10:17:03 AM
Wow, so now it comes out... Not only do you have "Daddy Issues" but you are CLEARY and expert on military statistics... Hell, "I" can't even tell you about military statistics since I truly don't f*cking have the first damn clue. I reckon though if I didn't know shit, I would do what you just did: Simply parrot the bullshit you see on the mainstream media from a few bad apples who went crazy...
*bows* I am not worthy...
I just have to remind myself that people can say whatever they want no matter how much I disagree... But then again just because two people CAN make a baby, it doesn't mean they should.... (See [Insert any person of your loathing])
Meaning, just because we have freedom of speech, it doesn't make it right sometimes...
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: RegalSin on February 13, 2012, 01:38:21 PM
Halo vs the G-Man :pray:
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: MotherGunner on February 13, 2012, 01:54:23 PM
No hard feelings Regal, but you ARE a weird guy...
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: VenomMacbeth on February 13, 2012, 04:07:50 PM
Oh come on, man...the G-Man is like...god! There's no contest there.
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: HercTNT on February 13, 2012, 04:53:06 PM
Halo has nothing to do with military recruiting. The original game was supposed to be a real time rts and exclusive to the pc. Microsoft bought the rights, and in the 11th hour bungie retooled
the game to be a first person shooter for the xbox. Regal is so far off its not funny. Now the game Americas Army, was specifically made as a recruitment tool. I doubt that many people join
the military because of video games. But their is no doubt that the military is using video games to to recruit. If you watch the show future weapons you sill see that the military is even using
xbox and playstation like controls on some prototype hardware because thats what young people relate to.
Zeta is correct about the korean war. It never ended. They are still officially in a state of war.
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: SignOfZeta on February 13, 2012, 06:37:58 PM
You're all missing the point. America's Army isn't some unique thing for recruiting people, its just a symptom on a defining characteristic of American culture. For sure it is INCREDIBLY f*cked up, but we are indoctrinated from birth to accept militarism as a daily event. When I was in Chicago last year the Blue Angels were doing stupid tricks in the sky overhead, burning $100,000 a day in jet fuel. Why? There is a tank parked in the front yard of a house (VFW owned) down the street from me. Why? There is a NASCAR that says "Go Army" on it. Why? The supermarket near me sells Tipman paintball guns that are officially licensed by the US Army. In a society like ours people don't even notice this shit, but it should be extremely disturbing. In a place like Belgium or Japan or Iceland those things would be viewed as dystopian nightmare fuel.
Our government is broke as hell, but half our tax revenue goes into blowing up other countries or preparing to blow up other countries. We've let our leaders sucker us into one war after another for centuries and we look the other way when the evidence that we were lied to about foreign threats comes to the front. Where are those WMDs? Its just more more bullshit scam, as was the Tonkin incident, the sinking of the Maine, the catalysts for American wars against Spain, Mexico, the Philippines, Nicaragua, Honduras, Grenada, Panama, you name it. All bullshit. Why do we have 10,000 troops still occupying Okinawa? Bases in 130 countries? Americans can't even name 130 countries, but they'll pay the taxes to fund the bases. Enough nuclear weaponry to kill every human on the planet, this minute...but we're f*cking with Iran?
Of course if you question any of this you are accused of having your head in the sand (the opposite is true) or being unpatriotic (that part is true) by f*ckheads who buy commemorative coins from late night infomercials and think Obama is a Muslim.
Now we have the ultimate excuse; the War on Terror! WTF does that even mean? Will it end when "terror" is defeated? The perfect endless war. Well, endless as long as we have a million people willing to kill on command for the McDonalds manager pay. That's essential.
This isn't a trend unique to the US by any means. All wars are started with lies, and the people who start them always say they have no other choice. This just happens to be America's turn to be Italy, Egypt, Germany, England, France. Eventually we'll get tired of it, like England did, and China will take over the job. The thing that worries me is that military weapons now are much more powerful than they were when thousands of Britons were dying every month trying to keep India British. The stakes are higher for sure.
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: RegalSin on February 14, 2012, 03:37:43 AM
SignOfZeta I felt I was being rude towards Halo. Since I know their might be some Halo fans here. That is why my post looks smaller.
I feel your pain broaa, but I gave up complaining about this awhile back ( or at least I try to ). There are two things that are affecting this. The only real Americans are African Americans and the pro-Israelies wants US citizens to police the world. Their are other problems like the N-word, people walking their pants half-way down, not enough church goers, and the eastern invasion. When we axe both of these problems USA will shine like it did before the "Summer of love", and the "Zoot suit riots".
So remember if you love the US military break a 360 and send it back to Bill. 360 the Halo choice of consoles.
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: Necromancer on February 14, 2012, 03:46:04 AM
The only real Americans are African Americans and the pro-Israelies wants US citizens to police the world. Their are other problems like the N-word, people walking their pants half-way down, not enough church goers, and the eastern invasion. When we axe both of these problems USA will shine like it did before the "Summer of love", and the "Zoot suit riots".
Nope, nothing racist here.
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: MotherGunner on February 14, 2012, 04:20:16 AM
No Zeta, you’re missing the point, you are still making broad assumptions behind the reasons why those who join the military do so without having any intimate knowledge or context.
A symptom on a defining characteristic of American culture? OF COURSE it is! That’s how we, you know… got AMERICA!!??
I disagree we are indoctrinated from birth to accept militarism. How do I know? You’ve NEVER put on a uniform yourself and you have the freedom to talk shit without the fear of your government (our government) coming over to your house and throwing you into a Gulag.
I agree that our government is broke, and both sides of government are completely responsible. Not sure why you are blaming the right only (if my assumption is correct). If you want to have an objective view, then get one. This is certainly not it.
I don’t believe you have your head in the sand or are unpatriotic Zeta, in fact I believe the opposite. I believe you are VERY patriotic, love your country, and I love the fact that you have an opinion and can exercise your freedom of speech. Again, that’s how we got AMERICA. Because a small group of people decided to question, and protest, and pick up a weapon and stand a post. This is one reason why I proudly put on a uniform. I didn’t put one on to go to “War” though I certainly had accepted the possibility. Neither did my brother, we both joined to better ourselves. I have an outstanding job and have a great family. Could I have done it without the military? Of course, but the military helped define the outstanding work ethic I bring to my life every day. It is one reason why I have risen with greater tempo and success above my peers (many who are now laid off due to laziness) .
Again, you are generalizing and indirectly talking about the military like you know what is in every troop’s mind. I don’t even know that… Oh sure, I am POSITIVE the American Revolution started with lies. Sorry you’re so jaded Zeta, I can’t help that. You had “some” good points but the rest is lost on me. My point is, be glad you can at least ask why?
Why? Because throughout our American history men and women better than us have kept it that way. I never truly understood this until I lived that life myself. Before that, you’d be surprised to know that I was an anti-government liberal protester hanging out in San Francisco. That made me a shitty human being. Then for a while I became and ultra conservative and that produced the same result. Now I aspire to look at things objectively and find a balance. Extremes on both side is a miserable existence.
John Stuart Mill, a liberal, once said, “War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself.”
Glad I woke up…
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: SignOfZeta on February 14, 2012, 05:17:55 AM
What is your obsession with a person having to join the military to have a worthwhile view? Why would I join the Army if I hate the army? That makes no sense. Do you think I would like it more if I was missing a leg and mentally wrecked with PTSD? Yeah, I'd be in awesome shape then.
To me what makes a man, a decent human being, is the fortitude to analyze the world around you and do what's right. A solider is the rare sort of person (along with children, the insane, and the imprisoned) who doesn't do that AT ALL. A hired killer who does exactly what the President says or he goes into prison. If Obama says its time to invade Canada, a solider will just do it. Our ability to tell right from wrong will have to be suppressed. Independent thinking is nothing but an impediment. I don't claim to know what goes on in anyone's mind but my own (even that is a stretch sometimes) but I do understand the job description.
And this is not a "left versus right" thing, at least not in the American sense of the term. There are no professional politicians in this country that are anti-military. Every congressman has military contracts in his district, and he fights like like hell to protect all of them. Obama was in office for literally 20 minutes before ordering his first drone strike. The peace movement is as dead as the labor movement, health care, and the space program.
The idea of finding balance when there is none is one of the worst things about modern thinking. The US is a military culture. It got everything it has through conquest, slavery and genocide. There is no way to "balance" this. We invaded Iraq for no reason, brutally enforced sanctions on them for a decade, and then invaded them again. At the very least a million people died from this. Every excuse for it was a lie or massively blown out of proportion. There is no "balanced" viewpoint here without fabricating one from nothing.
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: MotherGunner on February 14, 2012, 05:27:10 AM
Zeta, You don't know shit about what type of person a soldier is and you are still making idiotic assumptions. Nice try trying to question my manhood by proxy and trying to say i'm insane. And you claim to not know what goes on in anyone's mind... dude get a grip.
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: Lilgrafx on February 14, 2012, 03:26:13 PM
We invaded Iraq for no reason, brutally enforced sanctions on them for a decade, and then invaded them again. At the very least a million people died from this. Every excuse for it was a lie or massively blown out of proportion. There is no "balanced" viewpoint here without fabricating one from nothing.
You sound terribly disappointed, not just about that, but life in general... Like 20 years later, worlds not really how you expected it to turn out ehh?
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: RegalSin on February 15, 2012, 03:46:39 AM
Enough of this, which ghost buster is the better ghost buster. Or the warhawk vs the pacifist insanity. Lets get back to fictional characters.
How about
Doctor Gangrene (killer tomatoes ) vs Doctor Robotnik?
Personally I love Doctor Gangrene because he was the actor who also played the villian in "Babes in Toyland" along with voice of the ficitonal Gangrene. He is presented as a Genius who will change and better the world but keeps being stopped.
Doctor Robotnik wants to control and owns the world. He controls all Casinos, and uses the money to fuel his building of robots. I could only assume the reason why Sonic is differnt is because of him. Like lab testing. ( that is a future Sonic game I will never be playing ).
or
Doctor Goldfoot ( bikini machine ) vs Doctor Morgus?
I don't know too much about these two. All I know is Goldfoot makes a machine that can generate an army of Bikini Bom-omb exploding women, who can or can not have super strenght.
I could assume, Morgus is more of a "Metropolis" Rotwang rip-off but screws with monsters like Frankenstien. Speaking of which
Rotwang vs Frankenstiene
or
Frankenstiene vs young Frankenstiene
or
Beetle Juice vs Elvira the non-porn version?
or
The Hulk ( TV hulk ) vs Mr Hyde?
I know that Hyde originally was just a strong brute, with a sick way of thinking. However he gain super strenght. The Hulk, at least the TV hulk was basically the same as Hyde but had a good Conscience
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: nectarsis on February 15, 2012, 03:52:31 AM
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: HercTNT on February 15, 2012, 06:20:23 AM
funny i was always afraid of boogerman :P
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: RegalSin on February 15, 2012, 07:43:46 AM
My Boogey man looked like snoopy but slightly differnt. I remember seeing him very clearly dancing in front of me.
Quote
You sound terribly disappointed, not just about that, but life in general... Like 20 years later, worlds not really how you expected it to turn out ehh?
Who knew the world was ran by idiots, who only made enough to reproduce and live. Yup just like the ending of "Saturn 3" or "Soylent Greens"
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: VenomMacbeth on February 21, 2012, 07:11:59 AM
SignOfZeta I felt I was being rude towards Halo. Since I know their might be some Halo fans here. That is why my post looks smaller.
<Guilty >.<
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: esteban on February 22, 2012, 09:45:08 AM
(A) The fact that this thread can go from Zeta's impassioned, incisive comments on America's hyper-militarized culture to "Boogerman" is mind-boggling. (http://junk.tg-16.com/images/pcds.png)
(B) Anyway, Zeta, I think MotherGunner would feel better if we acknowledged that, sadly, the military provides career opportunities to folks who would otherwise have few, if any, viable options in the job market. This is a reflection on the inequality in this country. I wish we (as a society) provided non-military career support/training/opportunities on the scale of the military, but we don't. Many programs (i.e. the G.I. Bill) are tied to military obligations...I wish there were massive programs with a civil service (non-military) obligation.
(C) Anyway, MotherGunner, it would probably be easier to have this discussion if we divorced (1) an individual's personal motivations for joining the military from (2) discussions of US Culture/US foreign policy. Surely we can find common ground on (2), even if we disagree about (1) (which tends to be a very sensitive topic, in general).
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: MotherGunner on October 18, 2012, 06:41:34 AM
Okay, it's been a while and unfortunate derailment aside, let's get this thread back on track and please stick to the subject! :P
Lord Dread (First seen in Captain Power, 1987-1988) Formerly Dr. Lyman Taggart, he was obsessed with the precision and "perfection" of machines and convinced himself that the next step in human evolution involved the merging of human consciousness in perfect mechanical bodies.
Vs.
The Borg* (First seen in Star Trek TNG, Q Who, 1989) A pseudo-race, dwelling in the Star Trek universe, the Borg take other species by force into the collective and connect them to "the hive mind"; the act is called assimilation and entails violence, abductions, and injections of cybernetic implants. The Borg's ultimate goal is "achieving perfection".
*one (1) drone.
Title: Re: Who would win in a fight?
Post by: Nando on October 18, 2012, 09:14:52 AM