PCEngineFans.com - The PC Engine and TurboGrafx-16 Community Forum
NEC TG-16/TE/TurboDuo => TG-16/TE/TurboDuo Sales & Trades => Topic started by: KnightWarrior on August 29, 2012, 09:06:46 AM
Title: Michael Jackson
Post by: KnightWarrior on August 29, 2012, 09:06:46 AM
Anyone a fan??
Would of been 54 today
One of best King of Pop
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: turboswimbz on August 29, 2012, 10:00:28 AM
Can't say I'm a fan, but i do enjoy many of his songs, The album Thriller is a world classic.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: RegalSin on August 29, 2012, 11:38:07 AM
Jackson was as commercial, as the Super 80's ( 1990s ) could get. He took his medical problem and turned it into music, the sad part is how people did not like the fact he choose to live as a kid, while being an adult.
He even did the music for Sonic 3 ( and 2 ) as well, because he really loved video games. The only reason why people was against, him was that he was originally black. Seriously, he was a great and normal person. I see why he would go to the doctor and live in his dreams, because on the outside he was just a danceaholic. In Return of the living dead, 2 they also had a Jackson Zombie, similar to the one from Splatter house NES.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Colossus1574 on August 29, 2012, 01:41:21 PM
Fan :-"
Grew up on Beat It and Thriller in grade 2 or 3 of elementary school. One of the greatest live performers of our time, puts some of the kiddie acts of today to shame who rely on remixing and lip syncing! Was so sad to hear about his passing right before his comeback concerts were about to begin in London :cry: Yah, he wasn't exactly a role model, but i didnt care about his personal life, rather remember him for his music and performances.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: TheClash603 on August 29, 2012, 01:47:10 PM
Yah, he wasn't exactly a role model, but i didnt care about his personal life, rather remember him for his music and performances.
This is the sentiment of many. Is anyone else confused that this guy can get away with doing what he did and be considered a legend?
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: turbokon on August 29, 2012, 01:52:50 PM
We were a big fan. Every time he had a new music video, it was like a big event in our household. We had his t-shirts. We used to listen to his music outside late at night and practice the moonwalk. One of my friends mastered both the front an back moonwalks.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Joe Redifer on August 29, 2012, 02:20:55 PM
Quote
Is anyone else confused that this guy can get away with doing what he did
What did he do?
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: TheClash603 on August 29, 2012, 03:03:54 PM
Is anyone else confused that this guy can get away with doing what he did
What did he do?
He was accused of several instances of child molestation.
If you say he wasn't convicted, then I suppose you think OJ was innocent too?
Rich people get away with anything in this country. Recently a doctor was driving drunk and texting in my town, when he hit an 18 year old girl and killed her. The guy then fled the scene and called his lawyer immediately to say "what do I do?" There was evidence proving he was drunk, texting, and fled the scene... however, he hired the best lawyers in the city and the defense was a public defender. The guy ended up with 6 months in minimum security prison (basically a dorm room). This guy was just rich, imagine if he were rich AND FAMOUS. This country's legal system is jacked.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: wilykat on August 29, 2012, 03:13:30 PM
He was accused of doing naughty stuff with little kids.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Joe Redifer on August 29, 2012, 05:36:32 PM
Quote
Rich people get away with anything in this country. .... This country's legal system is jacked.
Ah, guilty as charged. I see. Definitely guilty in the court of public opinion. Of course nobody would ever do anything to try and get money from the guy, especially being as weird as he was. Nah... that could never happen!
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: nodtveidt on August 29, 2012, 05:57:08 PM
Innocent until proven guilty is the law of the land... guilty until proven innocent is the law of the media and all Fox News loyalists.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: NightWolve on August 29, 2012, 06:05:04 PM
Was a fan, back when he was black, before his "transformations..." Seeing a thread title on him all of a sudden took me by surprise.
Rich people get away with anything in this country. .... This country's legal system is jacked.
Ah, guilty as charged. I see. Definitely guilty in the court of public opinion. Of course nobody would ever do anything to try and get money from the guy, especially being as weird as he was. Nah... that could never happen!
Yeah, good point. I think he was just way too weird, maybe just very kid-like himself and that's why he liked hanging with kids, so I doubt he ever sexually abused anyone... but then his weirdness gives me pause. There was that interview where he revealed he would let some of the kids sleep with him, you know, a "sleepover..." That's mildly appropriate with biological parents and only up to a certain age, but I don't rule out him and the kids having become that close to feel comfortable with that... I dunno, but you're right, the parents of one of the accusers wanted a pot of gold and they got it in the sum of millions.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Xray on August 29, 2012, 07:12:11 PM
I think the evidence that he was a hopeless boy loving pedo is far beyond any doubt. So he was a complete POS as a person, and deserved to be castrated, and worse. I won't deny his talent though, even though its not my style of music. I'm much more the Black Sabbath, Hendrix, Halen, GNR kind of guy ,, But I can listen to some of his songs without wanting to destroy the radio. To save my life I could probably name 6 or 7 of his songs, and they are some catchy tunes. They were more gimmick than anything in the Motown days ,, But again, success is hard to argue with. He advanced as a talented writer and performer, his sales volume speaks for itself.
I hear people say "Oh yeah, Elvis really sucked, and the Beatles were way over rated" ect ... [I happen to like both of them], I'll just say "Yeah Ok, you go out and sell 125,000,000 records, then your opinion might mean a little more". Same thing with MJ.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Duo_R on August 29, 2012, 07:15:33 PM
I liked MJ's music, unfortunately his weirdness made it "weird" to listen to his music, until he died (then it was cool again).
With Michael Jackson gone...and Neil Armstrong now dead....we are losing all the Moonwalkers!
Rich people get away with anything in this country. .... This country's legal system is jacked.
Ah, guilty as charged. I see. Definitely guilty in the court of public opinion. Of course nobody would ever do anything to try and get money from the guy, especially being as weird as he was. Nah... that could never happen!
Yeah, good point. I think he was just way too weird, maybe just very kid-like himself and that's why he liked hanging with kids, so I doubt he ever sexually abused anyone... but then his weirdness gives me pause. There was that interview where he revealed he would let some of the kids sleep with him, you know, a "sleepover..." That's mildly appropriate with biological parents and only up to a certain age, but I don't rule out him and the kids having become that close to feel comfortable with that... I dunno, but you're right, the parents of one of the accusers wanted a pot of gold and they got it in the sum of millions.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Bernie on August 29, 2012, 07:27:06 PM
Xray, there has NEVER been any solid evidence that MJ done anything inappropriate. It was all he said she said crap. I want you to think about something for a minute. The parents that were accusing MJ of molestation, they dropped it when they got a lump sum of money. That tells me one of two things is going on there. Either they were in it for the money to begin with and it was all a scandal. Or...it was true and money was more important than what happened to their child supposedly. As a parent I tend to lean towards people going for the jugular cause they knew there would be a payout. Its bullshit and always was. Only thing MJ is guilty of is being a weird mofo and loving children and trying to give them happiness that he was robbed of as a child.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Xray on August 29, 2012, 07:48:55 PM
Plenty enough evidence for me, thank you very much. He bought his way out, no question about it. You think kids knowing about warts on his cock that just happened to match warts that were in fact on his cock was just a made up coincidence ? You think details of him plying children with alcohol in the form of "Jesus Juice" was just innocent childs play ? You think routinely laying in bed with kids is healthy, harmless bonding ? Nuh uh - He was a classic pedo, pure n simple - And a pretty obvious and outgoing one, at that. His every action, from buying a private zoo and amusement park to his constant Toys R US shopping sprees with various target children were nothing more than good old fashioned child grooming.
As far as the parents, they sure as hell should have been charged with child abuse for letting their kids hang out with this known creep. They were for sure after some $$, and didn't mind putting their own children in harms way to get it.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Bernie on August 29, 2012, 08:01:49 PM
Lol. Choose to believe whatever the media says. I cant make ya see things differently.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: SMF on August 29, 2012, 08:01:53 PM
Finally, Jordan Chandler admits he lied about Michael Jackson of indecency, which became the pilot to the court case against the “King of Pop”. Jordan Chandler the child that accused Michaelfor misbehaving with him finally came forward to tell that the case was based on lies. EvanChandler was the father of the kid, he never approved the friendship between Jordan and MichaelJackson, and he is the one who accused “King of Pop” for having an unnatural relationship withhis son.Michael and Jordan were friends but Jordan’s father never approved their friendship, encouraged by his father Jordan charged “MJ” for the indecency in their relation. The case hit the streets,newspapers and tabloids and the only names people knew back then were Michael Jackson,Jordan and Evan Chandler, and media and law firms are hounding Michael Jackson.It would be better if I do not make it all in favor of Michael Jackson, but it seems like we mightnever be able to know the truth. It is very much possible that Michael or his family have usedtheir money to bribe or buy Even and Jordan and they have changed their statements, but whoknows.Anyway, these are the rumors I have heard over the internet and decided to write about it. After Michael Jackson’s death, Chandler has come forward and said that he made up the story just toinsult the “King of Pop” for the money. Now it is your turn to leave the comments and tell that according to you what can be the correct possibility.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: SMF on August 29, 2012, 08:07:37 PM
What do boys do when they are given a HUGE MANSION to play in? They snoop and pry. How mant times have us as men fell asleep with boxers on and covered up only to wake up and guess whos standing tall popping out the piss hole?
A boy couldnt have woken up early to play with a bunch of video games and arcades in MJ's house and when he got home remarked to his parents about i seen MJ's thingy and as middle class living paycheck to paycheck parents LIGHTBULB We can sue him for millions cause our son seen MJ's morning wood.
Only thing i agree on is they shouldnt have slept in the same bed. But cmon you seen MJ and all he ever did was act like a kid and enjoy life.
I for one say he was sued by the same morons that sued McDonalds cause their coffee was hot. (not marked on cup) So they win millions.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Xray on August 29, 2012, 08:23:13 PM
Lol. Choose to believe whatever the media says. I cant make ya see things differently.
Oh yeah, and you must get your pure, unfiltered info from some other source ??
His own sister once famously said: ""I cannot and will not be a silent collaborator in his crimes against young children ... Forget about the superstar, forget about the icon. If he was any other 35-year-old man who was sleeping with little boys, you wouldn't like this guy"." ,,, But of course, you know better. [And yes, years later she claimed that her abusive husband made her say that].
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Bernie on August 29, 2012, 08:29:34 PM
Wow. Way to make it personal dude. I never said I knew better. What I said was there was never any evidence. Point blank and bottom line, no evidence. There is more evidence that it was a scam than an actual crime. Thats all I am trying to present.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Xray on August 29, 2012, 08:54:40 PM
Wow. Way to make it personal dude. I never said I knew better. What I said was there was never any evidence. Point blank and bottom line, no evidence. There is more evidence that it was a scam than an actual crime. Thats all I am trying to present.
Ok, I am a brainwashed lemming of the media ,,, You, on the other hand, presumably get better info elsewhere, and that info allows you to be positive that he never molested any children, just innocent fun, genuine love, and harmless shopping sprees & sleepovers. There was plenty of evidence, it was only though his accusers developing sudden amnesia and recanting their words after mass payouts that he was let off the hook. What about OJ, was he framed by vindictive $$ seekers as well ?
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: esteban on August 29, 2012, 09:32:08 PM
And here I thought folks would talk about how awesome the outtakes from "The Thriller" sessions were (you know, Vincent Price in the studio).
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Bernie on August 29, 2012, 09:42:40 PM
:-&
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Joe Redifer on August 29, 2012, 09:53:21 PM
His sister is also a jealous, attention-starved biotch. This is LaToya, after all. I think if you asked her to say the same thing today, she wouldn't. She'll say whatever gets her in the papers, in my opinion. Also, how would she be able to obtain any evidence? That's like your own sister accusing you of raping some chick. How would she know?
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Bernie on August 29, 2012, 09:57:18 PM
Look at my posts. Not once did I say he did not do anything. Also not one time did I say the word "you" which basically would have been pointing the finger. However, you did so several times. Pisses me off that we cant have a docile conversation and look at things from different point of views without making accusations about each other. I stand by my statement. There was no concrete evidence and what little evidence there was, was shaky at best.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: SMF on August 29, 2012, 10:54:56 PM
And here I thought folks would talk about how awesome the outtakes from "The Thriller" sessions were (you know, Vincent Price in the studio).
In my opinion the best track on the CD.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: soop on August 29, 2012, 11:29:18 PM
Basically, I liked him and his music pretty much until Moonwalker. He was still a great entertainer and singer, but mentally, f*cked.
But I have a very hard time resisting dancing to stuff like "Don't stop 'till you get enough"
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: TheClash603 on August 30, 2012, 12:20:12 AM
Don't forget that Corey Feldman said that he made him look at sexually explicit pictures with him when he was a kid. Feldman said Jackson never touched him and he had little to gain in making up the story, so that was just more proof.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: RegalSin on August 30, 2012, 01:04:48 AM
He was accused of doing naughty stuff with little kids.
He never actually did anything, the concerned parent and or kid was lying, about these things. Seriously, they make every kind of touch a bad touch. I wouldn't mind sleeping next to Jackson, and we could even tell scary stories. The parent wanted money from him. I mean seriously cut the guy some slack.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Arkhan on August 30, 2012, 03:41:41 AM
Free toys and zoos and amusement parks, and all I have to do is see a warty-dick?
I would've been down. Hell, when I was like 10, I saw worse shit on AOL on accident.
I MISSED OUT ON TOYS. GOD DAMNIT.
Also, who the f*ck believes Corey Feldman? He's been on drug benders, and all he does today is milk the f*cking lost boys for all it's worth.
Maybe he should've looked at those dirty pics with MJ a little longer so he'd have learned how to do some shit. Maybe he'd still have his hot, bitchy wife.
Then he could be like SHUT UP BITCH. TIME FOR THE TRUFFLE SHUFFLE ON MY ONE EYED WILLY.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: turbokon on August 30, 2012, 06:41:15 AM
Back to his music, Smooth Criminal is still my favorite then Thriller, man in the mirror, billie jean, beat it, bad and dirty diana.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Arkhan on August 30, 2012, 06:50:22 AM
Thought that said dirty diarhea and loled at it.
I like Smooth Criminal and Beat It alot.
I hate that black or white shit. It's lame.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Xray on August 30, 2012, 06:51:55 AM
Look at my posts. Not once did I say he did not do anything. Also not one time did I say the word "you" which basically would have been pointing the finger. However, you did so several times. Pisses me off that we cant have a docile conversation and look at things from different point of views without making accusations about each other. I stand by my statement. There was no concrete evidence and what little evidence there was, was shaky at best.
You still rambling to me ? I thought you were "done going back and forth" ? You tell me to shut the f*ck up - Something you'd be highly unlikely to do in person ,,, Then whine that we can't have a docile conversation ? Thats called hypocrisy holmes. I gave the f*cker his props musically and talent wise, now you are pissed cause I won't agree what a great guy with kids he was ? f*ck that, I stand by my conviction that he was a creepy boy loving molester in the 1st degree - Obviously you won't change that opinion, and obviously you are too star struck to have yours changed.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Xray on August 30, 2012, 06:59:06 AM
His sister is also a jealous, attention-starved biotch. This is LaToya, after all. I think if you asked her to say the same thing today, she wouldn't. She'll say whatever gets her in the papers, in my opinion. Also, how would she be able to obtain any evidence? That's like your own sister accusing you of raping some chick. How would she know?
Points granted. Its worth keeping in mind that just about everyone involved in the various cases have recanted, changed their stories, or developed sudden amnesia. This would suggest that they were bought off and/or intimidated. The whole family was/is attention starved, I don't think MJ was an exception - He obviously was nearly addicted to the attention of children, whether he actually did ass rape anyone or not, that is not normal, that is not a healthy mindset. He himself famously admitted to bedding down boys, I'm really mystified how any grown man can defend behavior like that.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Necromancer on August 30, 2012, 07:07:58 AM
You tell me to shut the f*ck up - Something you'd be highly unlikely to do in person
I loled. I'll tell you to shut the f*ck in person, just like I bet Bernie would too. What are you going to do, hit someone if they tell you to? Is this you?:
Thats called hypocrisy holmes. I gave the f*cker his props musically and talent wise, now you are pissed cause I won't agree what a great guy with kids he was ? f*ck that, I stand by my conviction that he was a creepy boy loving molester in the 1st degree - Obviously you won't change that opinion, and obviously you are too star struck to have yours changed.
He was great with kids. He gave them presents, took them on rides, touched their privates. It's alot of work, man. Beat It was actually a song about what he would do to his favorites.
He himself famously admitted to bedding down boys, I'm really mystified how any grown man can defend behavior like that.
He was rocketed to fame when he was like 5. Try not having a childhood, being loved by everyone (including kids), and having a ton of money, while being some skinny ass, fairly girly black dude that pelvic thrusts better than John Holmes.
You don't exactly grow up normal in that situation. You don't grow up at all really when you aren't put out into the real world.
You think he had a regular job, busted his ass at some bullshit store for minimum wage, and swept floors?
Nope. He waved his dick around on stage, moonwalked, grabbed his junk, screamed "hyehyehaaaa jamaoooon", etc. and made bank off of it.
He was a 12 year old boy trapped in a 50 year old womans body. lol.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Xray on August 30, 2012, 07:21:49 AM
Loudest mouths on any forum are always, but always, the ones with 1,000's of posts - Which tells me they don't get much action in real life. You guys are probably boy lovers yourselves, I'll take the high road and bow out of any further discourse with juvenile flame cravers like you two.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Necromancer on August 30, 2012, 08:26:37 AM
Loudest mouths on any forum are always, but always, the ones with 1,000's of posts - Which tells me they don't get much action in real life. You guys are probably boy lovers yourselves, I'll take the high road and bow out of any further discourse with juvenile flame cravers like you two.
Hmmmm.... I'd hate to see the low road.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Bernie on August 30, 2012, 09:44:02 AM
:-#
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: turboswimbz on August 30, 2012, 09:53:21 AM
Well I don't know too much there about all this judging, and guilty crap, I'll leave that to the judges and juries, and law students who study such things, What I can say is that I do indeed enjoy a good tune, or one that is bad enough to be good.
Speaking of which:
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Bernie on August 30, 2012, 09:59:44 AM
Yep, he did make some great music. :) Man in the mirror was one of my faves. :)
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: turboswimbz on August 30, 2012, 10:01:21 AM
Awwwww. I did enjoy that. forgot about that, to you tube and fill the work place with random songs that I'm thinking about!
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: HercTNT on August 30, 2012, 10:02:14 AM
Xray, before things got outta hand, the point they were trying to make in the begining is that their is no proof. The police went through MJ's estate with a fine toothed comb twice and while they found some really kinky stuff, none of it had to do with kids. I agree with bernie that MJ while extremely eccentric was most likely trying to make up for a lost childhood. I don't think anyone denies that having little kids over for sleep overs was a really poor idea and did not help him any. That being said more people came out in his defence that knew him personally than did accuse him of anything. Latoya jackson and corey feildman are hardly quality witnesses. What the news sources have to say is irrelevent anyways. they all have a vested interest in dirt, and the dirtier the better. They all cared more about ratings than the truth. The fact is, MJ was never brought up on charges, and no evidence was ever found. In this country that means he is innocent. Don't think i don't understand your point though. I certianly would not have let my kids stay over at his house knowing they would be all sleeping in the same bed. Thats just to damn weird. He was tried and convicted in public opinion alone and that's not how freedom works.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Bernie on August 30, 2012, 10:15:12 AM
Xray, before things got outta hand, the point they were trying to make in the begining is that their is no proof. The police went through MJ's estate with a fine toothed comb twice and while they found some really kinky stuff, none of it had to do with kids. I agree with bernie that MJ while extremely eccentric was most likely trying to make up for a lost childhood. I don't think anyone denies that having little kids over for sleep overs was a really poor idea and did not help him any. That being said more people came out in his defence that knew him personally than did accuse him of anything. Latoya jackson and corey feildman are hardly quality witnesses. What the news sources have to say is irrelevent anyways. they all have a vested interest in dirt, and the dirtier the better. They all cared more about ratings than the truth. The fact is, MJ was never brought up on charges, and no evidence was ever found. In this country that means he is innocent. Don't think i don't understand your point though. I certianly would not have let my kids stay over at his house knowing they would be all sleeping in the same bed. Thats just to damn weird. He was tried and convicted in public opinion alone and that's not how freedom works.
This.. :) Thanks Herc. And, just for the record, my kids wouldnt have had a sleepover with MJ either. lol
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: turboswimbz on August 30, 2012, 10:16:46 AM
I woulda slept over his house if he bought me TG16 Stuff! :)
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Bernie on August 30, 2012, 10:21:18 AM
You know you'd spend the night with Uncle Touchy for a Magical Chase.
HA! Maybe I would send my stepson.....
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: esteban on August 30, 2012, 10:43:31 AM
This thread started out innocently enough...
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: turboswimbz on August 30, 2012, 10:47:10 AM
It's always the good ones that go bad! (totally refering to threads based on estebans comment, I am not commenting on a person being good or bad)
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: RegalSin on August 30, 2012, 11:53:36 AM
That is just because the bad people in the world, are the ones who were never wanted to begin with. Nobody is never bad, they just make retarded laws, against the unwanted people.
Leave Michael Jackson alone, as kid he worked like a man, so when does he finally gets to be a kid? I guess ever man after a certain age, should throw pool parties with saggy models, and get married to a wayward teenage bride, or something like that, just because it seems normal. Is it normal for Opera to bath herself in a pool full of chocolate?
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Xray on August 30, 2012, 01:56:04 PM
Loudest mouths on any forum are always, but always, the ones with 1,000's of posts - Which tells me they don't get much action in real life. You guys are probably boy lovers yourselves, I'll take the high road and bow out of any further discourse with juvenile flame cravers like you two.
Actually asswipe, I was not really a MJ fan. All I was saying was there was NEVER any solid proof. Get your head out your ass. Thats it, thats all, end of story. Sounds to me, that you stand by your convictions on myths and media stories blown out of proportion. I broke bad with you, when you made it personal. Nobody asked you to be judge and jury. So, yeah.. anyway. Far as having the biggest mouths on the internet, for real? lol. Dont make me laugh. All this would have been prevented IF you sir, had not taken offense to someone else having a different point of view. Show me concrete evidence, I will shut the f*ck up. And stooping to threatening on the internet?? LOL. I wouldn't say anything here that I wouldn't say in person. If this is how you acted in a normal conversation, not allowing others to say, "Hey, wait a second...this is what I think." then you don't belong in a SOCIETY, let alone a forum. And furthermore, I certainly would have said exactly what I just said, then walked away. Like I am doing now. I have too many good friends here to let this kinda shit get me in trouble here. Oh, one more thing.....
Come get some.... :-" :-" :-" :-" https://www.facebook.com/EWWITSMYFACE
Oh wow, anime tattoos and and piercings, very intimidating ! I actually wasn't even referring to you, what you quoted, but you can stick your finger right up your ass, don't have the time of day to bicker with you either, pedo defender.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Bernie on August 30, 2012, 02:31:11 PM
:)
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: KnightWarrior on August 30, 2012, 03:39:03 PM
Whoa people, What's with the fighting
Anyhoo, Billie Jean is my Fav Song of all time
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: SamIAm on August 30, 2012, 03:59:57 PM
I agree that there is no evidence that isn't contestable. People's opinions come down to their gut reactions, and those aren't worth much. I'm heavily inclined to think that he didn't do it.
Also, Thriller and Off The Wall are great albums, and the Sonic 3 soundtrack is awesome.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Bernie on August 30, 2012, 04:01:08 PM
Yeah... sorry Knight. :( I get carried away sometimes. Man in the Mirror and Beat it are two of my faves.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: KnightWarrior on August 30, 2012, 04:39:04 PM
That's ok
There just in it for the money btw, I was reading one of your replys
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: nodtveidt on August 30, 2012, 07:27:28 PM
Well, this has been amusing. :lol:
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Bernie on August 30, 2012, 07:34:58 PM
Always Rover!
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Arkhan on August 31, 2012, 03:27:22 AM
Loudest mouths on any forum are always, but always, the ones with 1,000's of posts - Which tells me they don't get much action in real life. You guys are probably boy lovers yourselves, I'll take the high road and bow out of any further discourse with juvenile flame cravers like you two.
I loled.
Me, not get any action in real life? That's hilarious. You're a dipshit.
Also, I have thousands of posts because I'm an active member of this community. This includes making games for the Turbo Grafx.
Maybe you should shut the f*ck up and stop making ignorant ass accusations about forum members here.
Or you could keep being a man lovin' penis oven and wonder why noone likes you.
back on topic, I'd have let MJ touch my boyparts for a magical chase.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: tpivette on August 31, 2012, 04:05:18 PM
Geez, you get a couple of Turbo fans and they agree on everything Turbo related (which is what this site is for after all)... but throw MJ into the mix and suddenly they're at each others throats...
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Bernie on August 31, 2012, 04:12:52 PM
Wasnt the subject, but his "my way is right and everyone else is wrong" attitude.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: ProfessorProfessorson on August 31, 2012, 05:08:47 PM
Xray, making important decisions daily in the imaginary criminal justice system he runs both as judge and prosecution, based solely on media provided evidence.....Umm yeah...... MJ may have been guilty, or may not have. He did not really go out of his way to prove his innocence, and he kept on inviting kids over long after initial problems appeared, but also, no one really had a massive amount of damning evidence either. Being eccentric itself isn't a crime. He's dead now, so now it only really matters to the supposed victims, their parents who some of which seemed to be more interested in payouts or whatever, and the prosecution who evidently dropped the ball if something did indeed occur. Nothing worth going apeshit crazy over Xray....Not now anyway...
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Xray on August 31, 2012, 05:38:55 PM
Xray, making important decisions daily in the imaginary criminal justice system he runs both as judge and prosecution, based solely on media provided evidence.....Umm yeah...... MJ may have been guilty, or may not have. He did not really go out of his way to prove his innocence, and he kept on inviting kids over long after initial problems appeared, but also, no one really had a massive amount of damning evidence either. Being eccentric itself isn't a crime. He's dead now, so now it only really matters to the supposed victims, their parents who some of which seemed to be more interested in payouts or whatever, and the prosecution who evidently dropped the ball if something did indeed occur. Nothing worth going apeshit crazy over Xray....Not now anyway...
Apeshit crazy ? I guess you never seen crazy then - And I don't see you on record censuring anyone posting half pics of them flipping birds, and calling me all sorts of juvenile names - Don't know what else these jokers have been saying, as I took the high road and put them on ignore. Nice to be objective ! I'll state a few things for the record, hopefully you won't have a heart attack or anything - And hopefully you won't fly off the handle, and start issuing facebook/twitter show downs [don't have an account on either, don't want or need one]:
* No question in my mind that he was a sick, boy loving pedo, you are free to differ, doesn't bother me in the least. * Would never hang with anyone who listens to a fruity guy like that - Never have, never will.
I get my opinions from "media provided evidence" ? Where, pray tell, do you get yours ??
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Bernie on August 31, 2012, 05:45:16 PM
You started all that shit with your attitude that everyone was wrong but you. Anyone reading through the thread KNOWS where the attitude generated from you.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Xray on August 31, 2012, 06:15:12 PM
Oh shit, someones on the rag tonight ! Or maybe permanently ! Watcha think about that, ProfessorProfessorson ?? Apeshit, or what ?
Don't know why that girly rant was emailed to me ,,, Lets just say, pierced snookums, that I am not about to indulge your childish passion for flames - And at least I know who my daddy is, pedo foster child.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Bernie on August 31, 2012, 06:21:49 PM
Wow....
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: ProfessorProfessorson on August 31, 2012, 06:22:28 PM
Loudest mouths on any forum are always, but always, the ones with 1,000's of posts - Which tells me they don't get much action in real life. You guys are probably boy lovers yourselves, I'll take the high road and bow out of any further discourse with juvenile flame cravers like you two.
/\THIS/\ is why you're having f*cking problems now. You've gone off on the deep end and turned yourself into a proverbial train wreck on this thread.
Oh shit, someones on the rag tonight ! Or maybe permanently ! Watcha think about that, ProfessorProfessorson ?? Apeshit, or what ?
Don't know why that girly rant was emailed to me ,,, Lets just say, pierced snookums, that I am not about to indulge your childish passion for flames - And at least I know who my daddy is, pedo foster child.
What the f*ck are you rambling on about there? Are you implying your daddy was named Pedo Foster Child? Don't you have a bag of dicks ready to stuff in that big fat f*cking mouth of yours already?
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Bernie on August 31, 2012, 06:38:09 PM
He is referring to a pm I set.him. Which is very cordial by the way. I save all my outgoing messages so when I get home I will copy/paste what I wrote in response to his response here. Cant do it from my phone.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: ProfessorProfessorson on August 31, 2012, 06:46:51 PM
He is referring to a pm I set.him. Which is very cordial by the way. I save all my outgoing messages so when I get home I will copy/paste what I wrote in response to his response here. Cant do it from my phone.
It's too bad he's gone all f*cking mental and shit, accusing people of being pedobears and what not just because people wont agree with him inthe manner he wants them to or whatever. He had a great idea with the TG16 lit sign things, had me really interested, but I wont deal with anyone who goes f*cking mental over shit like this. He's takin it all way way too personal.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: TheClash603 on August 31, 2012, 06:56:17 PM
Well Xray was right in what he said about MJ, but just wrong in how he said it. MJ guy molested children, no doubt. It is a weird world we live in where stuff like molesting is excusable because you have good dance moves.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: HercTNT on August 31, 2012, 07:09:16 PM
Well Xray was right in what he said about MJ, but just wrong in how he said it. MJ guy molested children, no doubt. It is a weird world we live in where stuff like molesting is excusable because you have good dance moves.
You have no more proof that he did, than anyone else does. His belongings and his estates were all searched completely and nothing was ever found. the point is, in our legal system you don't have to prove you didn't, or you would not be innocent until proven guilty. Now, that does not mean you're not entitled to your opinions. As professor said, its not like MJ helped his image all that much with his bizarre behavior guilty or not. One can certianly see many would believe MJ was guilty. Its all moot though as: he's dead, and: this is chit chat and not fighting street. The way people are going fruity over this is really nuts. Does everyone realize its a full moon tonight?
edited for mispelling
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Arkhan on August 31, 2012, 07:12:58 PM
lol. who shows up, makes < 100 posts, lashes out at the regulars, and then puts them on ignore?
Dipshits.
That's who.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: ProfessorProfessorson on August 31, 2012, 07:21:45 PM
Well Xray was right in what he said about MJ, but just wrong in how he said it. MJ guy molested children, no doubt. It is a weird world we live in where stuff like molesting is excusable because you have good dance moves.
Its not for me to decide if he did it or not, and if it was, I'd personally require more evidence then just what ever is provided by the 10 O'Clock News before I make my final decision on someones guilt. As is I feel it was up to law enforcement to prove in a court of law whether he was guilty or not. I am a firm believer in innocent until proven guilty. Regardless, as a responsible parent, personally, I don't care who the person was, star or not, I'd not have been sending my kids over for sleep overs with "adults". Thats just asking for it and I don't understand the logic of the parents who did that, and Michael Jackson should have been considered eccentric enough as it is that it wouldn't be worth the risk. For them to do that, they might as well have been handing their kids over to any creepy guy that pulled up in a white van offering free candy and sodas because they clearly did not act responsibly with their children, regardless of whether MJ did it or not.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Bernie on September 01, 2012, 01:05:40 AM
:-#
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: esteban on September 01, 2012, 01:17:30 AM
(http://junk.tg-16.com/images/hany_in_the_sky.png) Hany, startled awake in the middle of the night by a violent thunderclap, looks up to the heavens and pleads: "Peace, love and harmony. Is that too much to ask?"
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Emerald Rocker on September 01, 2012, 04:58:58 AM
I have reviewed the evidence and now deliver a stunning verdict! And that verdict is...
Sorry Bernie, but after reading that series of quotes that you posted, your line of "Lol. Choose to believe whatever the media says." is where this thing shut down.
Until then, you were both talking about MJ -- you believed MJ is innocent (you blatantly said so -- you didn't stop at saying "there's no evidence", you actually said he's innocent), meanwhile Xray believed MJ is guilty. You both presented your cases in classic bro speak with lines like "only thing MJ is guilty of is being a weird mofo" versus "he was a complete POS as a person, and deserved to be castrated".
But then you dismissed Xray's view as being based on the media, as though your view is based on some higher authority. You acted like you somehow knew better, and he totally called you on it. That's when you started back-pedaling, claiming to be misinterpreted, started saying that he made it personal, etc... but Xray's got a point. You escalated this thing twice (once by dissing his opinion, and again by telling him to "shut the **** up"), so you don't get to play the victim card.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Keranu on September 01, 2012, 05:07:26 AM
My verdict: Michael Jackson is the shit; always has been, always will be. If you don't like him, go play some Lords of Thunder.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: esteban on September 01, 2012, 05:20:44 AM
My verdict: Michael Jackson is the shit; always has been, always will be. If you don't like him, go play some Lords of Thunder.
(http://junk.tg-16.com/images/hany_in_the_sky.png) With full confidence*, Hany declares "I HEREBY SUPPORT THIS VERDICT. TG-16 COURT ADJOURNED."
P.S. As Hany is quick to point out (with heavy heart), Emerald Rocker has no jurisdiction to make a ruling. He can, however, provide a brief that lays out his reasoning. The TG-16 COURT has examined Emerald Rocker's brief and found it pithy and coherent. That said, Michael Jackson is the shit.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: nodtveidt on September 01, 2012, 06:19:48 AM
No evidence, no guilt. Case closed.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: TheClash603 on September 01, 2012, 06:45:09 AM
How does everyone feel about Casey Anthony? OJ Simpson?
Fixed to cancel troll-notion, outside of Fighting Street.
...but my point remains. This country further spirals down a path of degeneration that sickens me every day.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: HercTNT on September 01, 2012, 06:55:05 AM
appreciate the edit, just trying to keep things alittle more civil.
edited to acknowledge clashes edit :)
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: turboswimbz on September 01, 2012, 08:29:01 AM
you know what's as good as MJ ... MC
That's right
Mac and Cheese. Mac and Cheese.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: nodtveidt on September 01, 2012, 09:29:22 AM
Same thing in both of those cases, Clash... no evidence, no guilt.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: TheClash603 on September 01, 2012, 09:46:44 AM
Same thing in both of those cases, Clash... no evidence, no guilt.
The thing is, there was evidence and plenty of it, just no guilt found.
Juries are comprised of a group of average joes that decide the fate of the defendant. The trick here is that there are very high paid lawyers who are excellent at gaming the legal system. These guys make millions of dollars each year because they are able to tip the jury selection in their favor. If you are a rich man about to go on trial, why pay hundreds of thousands of dollars for a high priced lawyer and not just get the public defender? The reason is because the high priced lawyer gives you an unfair advantage in gaming the legal system.
Go outside and walk down a crowded urban street. Tell me that if someone you know was murdered by a wealthy or famous person, you would be comfortable with some of these people on the jury?
Innocence in a court of law does not mean you are innocent, it just means you won your case.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: ProfessorProfessorson on September 01, 2012, 10:03:39 AM
I have reviewed the evidence and now deliver a stunning verdict! And that verdict is...
Sorry Bernie, but after reading that series of quotes that you posted, your line of "Lol. Choose to believe whatever the media says." is where this thing shut down.
Until then, you were both talking about MJ -- you believed MJ is innocent (you blatantly said so -- you didn't stop at saying "there's no evidence", you actually said he's innocent), meanwhile Xray believed MJ is guilty. You both presented your cases in classic bro speak with lines like "only thing MJ is guilty of is being a weird mofo" versus "he was a complete POS as a person, and deserved to be castrated".
But then you dismissed Xray's view as being based on the media, as though your view is based on some higher authority. You acted like you somehow knew better, and he totally called you on it. That's when you started back-pedaling, claiming to be misinterpreted, started saying that he made it personal, etc... but Xray's got a point. You escalated this thing twice (once by dissing his opinion, and again by telling him to "shut the **** up"), so you don't get to play the victim card.
I can see your point, but at the same time, I think the thing is Bernie is saying he isn't just going to play the part of judge, prosecution, and jury, and say MJ is guilty without actual evidence presented to him from sources other then the media. To be honest, what other "evidence" was provided other then what seedy tidbits the media put out there? Nothing like DNA test results, evidence from rape kits, etc were presented, and no case went forward into a court room for a trial, where ALL legitimate available evidence could be presented and testimony could be presented before a properly appointed judge and jury.
We as a nation would be in sad shape if someone actually was convicted solely due to hearsay and articles run in the morning news, without actual due process. The only trial that should have mattered here is the one in the court of law, not the one of public opinion. The one of public opinion should have played out afterwards after the accused got their fair shake. Unfortunately that did not happen, guilty or not.
And as stated above, Bernie did try to cool things down with the guy and make amends. The guy acts like he's never taken part in forum activity before though. Basically hes accused a bunch of people here of being pedo sympathizers and crap on no basis other then that they don't agree with his opinion or told him to f*ck off, people who refuse to "convict" someone simply based on heresay and media tidbits.
Neither Bernie nor Xray are victims, but I don't think Bernie was playing the victim card either. He posted what he said and has shown he tried to cool things down with the guy. Xray wont have any part of it though. Things did not really get out of control until all the pedo accusations started up and the implied threats of physical violence or wtf ever Xray was trying to convey there were posted.
I repeat, nothing said by Bernie or anyone else deserved the kind of lashing out Xray did. Xray took it to the next level by attacking peoples character and convictions here. There was no need for it to go that far, and just to grind it in, Xray has indeed carried over this petty crap into his raffle and sales. There is simply no justification for that.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: tggodfrey on September 01, 2012, 10:32:06 AM
X-Ray
Perhaps MJ is guilty, perhaps he is innocent. The only people you can be mad at are the Cops, Judges, and Jurys. In other words you get to be angry and the very fundemental aspect of our jurisdiction that lets pedphiles and their victems walk free......That is the concept that we will allow a million guilty men walk free before we convict one innocent person. If you dont like it there is a place you can protest and your free to do so....Washington DC. Throwing a hissy fit in a forum because you spent your childhood fondled by your late uncle touchy and your mom blamed you for it is not really a productive way to use your time.......Then again neither is sitting in the house all day playing video games but we all do it from time to time.
Before you attempt to insult Bernie by telling him what he can shove up his ass....take a minute to consider that many people actually enjoy the ol glory hole and in reality all your really doing is wasting your time.
As for OJ......thats one smart motherf(*&R. I would pay anything to know how you kill the bitch who is f*cking you over and walk. I could make one hell of a living doing that. Instead I am plagued with this stench that keeps coming out of my crawlspace and my freezer is already full.
Now if you actually are still reading and your mind hasnt drifted off like mine tends to with every other long winded post on this forum......One honest and serious word of advice.......Stop taking the interwebz so serious..........who really gives a flying rat f*ck what someones opinion really is? Is alienating yourself on the forum really worth some retarded bickering over something pointless such as an opinion? Of course not but your doing a good job of it and in the end all your actually accomplishing is insulting everyone's intelligence. All that will do is make people not want to work with you regardless of what you try and present to the community in terms of sales or trades and it will reduce your game hunting to ebay and whatever events you attend. My point here is all your doing is hurting yourself, if your here to acquire games becuase ebay is retro-rapists or to discuss a common interest then your obviously screwing yourself because noone is going to want to deal with you.
Terry
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Bernie on September 01, 2012, 10:38:43 AM
I have reviewed the evidence and now deliver a stunning verdict! And that verdict is...
Sorry Bernie, but after reading that series of quotes that you posted, your line of "Lol. Choose to believe whatever the media says." is where this thing shut down.
Until then, you were both talking about MJ -- you believed MJ is innocent (you blatantly said so -- you didn't stop at saying "there's no evidence", you actually said he's innocent), meanwhile Xray believed MJ is guilty. You both presented your cases in classic bro speak with lines like "only thing MJ is guilty of is being a weird mofo" versus "he was a complete POS as a person, and deserved to be castrated".
But then you dismissed Xray's view as being based on the media, as though your view is based on some higher authority. You acted like you somehow knew better, and he totally called you on it. That's when you started back-pedaling, claiming to be misinterpreted, started saying that he made it personal, etc... but Xray's got a point. You escalated this thing twice (once by dissing his opinion, and again by telling him to "shut the **** up"), so you don't get to play the victim card.
Yes, I said he was innocent, because he was NEVER proved guilty with viable evidence. Dismissing his view as being based on the media, is exactly what I did. By your "investigation" standards, if someone came along and pointed the finger at ANYONE, then it hits the media, bam they are guilty. Why, because that is what sells. I am not playing the victim card as you say. [-( And I most certainly was NOT speaking in bro talk or whatever the hell you call it. I spelled motherf*cker like mofo cause I was trying to be a little less vulgar. Mofo looks much better than motherf*cker... Dont you think? :lol:
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Bernie on September 01, 2012, 10:41:34 AM
As for OJ......thats one smart motherf(*&R. I would pay anything to know how you kill the bitch who is f*cking you over and walk. I could make one hell of a living doing that. Instead I am plagued with this stench that keeps coming out of my crawlspace and my freezer is already full.
Terry
This... I love it!! I always felt that bitch deserved what she got. And hell yeah I think OJ did it. Too bad he was too damn stupid to stay out of prison for too long tho.. Damn, get away with killing his ex-bitch and then get caught in armed robbery? WTF??
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Emerald Rocker on September 01, 2012, 10:57:00 AM
This... I love it!! I always felt that bitch deserved what she got. And hell yeah I think OJ did it. Too bad he was too damn stupid to stay out of prison for too long tho.. Damn, get away with killing his ex-bitch and then get caught in armed robbery? WTF??
:shock:
You actually think Nicole Brown Simpson deserved to be gruesomely murdered? Wow. Even if that's supposed to be a sick joke, it's not funny.
That does it. You're banned from my raffles.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Bernie on September 01, 2012, 11:17:39 AM
Who gives a shit?
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: ProfessorProfessorson on September 01, 2012, 11:24:01 AM
And when you do one that isn't just a mock one cluttering up the sales area asking for free stuff let me know. :P
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: RegalSin on September 01, 2012, 12:25:11 PM
Nicole went to Prison? anybody could have done it. The biggest problem, with the whole OJ thing, was him running away. I remember the chase was on television, all day long, nothing but ' hey lets get this black man, he had do something wrong. It was probably entertainment for negative people. Just nothing but a white truck, on television all day long. He was also caught for stealing cable television. Their was two people that was dead that night, as well. Everybody just rode his business like the worlds greatest joke.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Emerald Rocker on September 01, 2012, 12:38:41 PM
RegalSin, I don't understand your post. Just to be safe, you're banned from my raffles, too.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Bernie on September 01, 2012, 12:41:40 PM
RegalSin, I don't understand your post. Just to be safe, you're banned from my raffles, too.
Lol. Nobody ever understands what regal is saying!
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: ProfessorProfessorson on September 01, 2012, 12:44:19 PM
I find it ironic that at the end of it all concerning the pedo mess, Regal comes in to post his two cents, and its not about MJ. :lol:
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: RegalSin on September 01, 2012, 01:13:01 PM
We were talking about Jackson, and then somebody mention the media about him. All of that mess up till his pill popping sleep case. They found nothing but
RegalSin, I don't understand your post. Just to be safe, you're banned from my raffles, too.
I was talking about about back in the 1990's it was on television all day long. Entertainment for racist people is what I called it. Around late 1990, a man in Texas was dragged from a truck. Same thing basically, but we are talking about mass media coverage, I am sure it is up on boobtube.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Sparky on September 01, 2012, 02:04:22 PM
f*ck off regal no one cares..
I go on holidays and come back to catch up :P... Bernie is a good guy and my first impressions of xray are the same, this mj shit train got out of control way to fast... And tensions got high over this guy? Come on guys.... Michael f*cking Jaskson.... Save it for gougers or a$$holes like Swiss, you 2 should just hug it out and Bernie did try to cool the jets some but i think at the time anger was still there so i think a couple Pms to each other would end this. (( shrugs as who the f*ck am I to say But my 2 cents))
& Dirty Diana is a great song by the Jackson :)
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Bernie on September 01, 2012, 02:11:39 PM
Yeah Sparky. I tried to PM and make good. But its cool. I will just agree to disagree and for me this is over. Xray, those pieces you are making look pretty good.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Sparky on September 01, 2012, 02:28:25 PM
Bernie you are cool guy and we all get hot headed even me :P I think you pulled back when it started going down to shits-ville so i hope X-ray can meet ya half way as this is just silly. Hey it's between you 2 so tell me to f@ckoff anytime but I hope things cool down between yas.... I host groups hugs on Sunday :P
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: PunkicCyborg on September 01, 2012, 02:30:25 PM
I used to read this magazine in like 1991 called Disney Adventures. It was always at the grocery store next to the archies. It had some comic and stuff in it and this was like when MJ was buddy buddy with Macaulay Culkin. There were always articles about Neverland and even raffles to win tickets to go there! This was right before he was accused of molestation but I even remember when I was like 6 and 7 reading this and thinking it was creepy as heck that anyone would want to spend time at this dudes mansion. I do like MJs music though from the 80s and Captain Eo was the shit!
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: ProfessorProfessorson on September 01, 2012, 02:30:59 PM
Bernie you are cool guy and we all get hot headed even me :P I think you pulled back when it started going down to shits-ville so i hope X-ray can meet ya half way as this is just silly. Hey it's between you 2 so tell me to f@ckoff anytime but I hope things cool down between yas.... I host groups hugs on Sunday :P
The ball is kind of in Xrays court, though I think at this point its more then just Bernie he may want to make amends with. Hes supposed to have some "list of 4" or something going. Its up to him either way.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: PunkicCyborg on September 01, 2012, 02:32:34 PM
I go on holidays and come back to catch up :P... Bernie is a good guy and my first impressions of xray are the same, this mj shit train got out of control way to fast... And tensions got high over this guy? Come on guys.... Michael f*cking Jaskson.... Save it for gougers or a$$holes like Swiss, you 2 should just hug it out and Bernie did try to cool the jets some but i think at the time anger was still there so i think a couple Pms to each other would end this. (( shrugs as who the f*ck am I to say But my 2 cents))
& Dirty Diana is a great song by the Jackson :)
this was a pretty great post.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Sparky on September 01, 2012, 02:37:35 PM
Bernie you are cool guy and we all get hot headed even me :P I think you pulled back when it started going down to shits-ville so i hope X-ray can meet ya half way as this is just silly. Hey it's between you 2 so tell me to f@ckoff anytime but I hope things cool down between yas.... I host groups hugs on Sunday :P
The ball is kind of in Xrays court, though I think at this point its more then just Bernie he may want to make amends with. Hes supposed to have some "list of 4" or something going. Its up to him either way.
List of 4? ......just silly... Let's have a look at the topic title again... Micheal Jackson. Someone change it to Swiss is a dick and we can have some real fun.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: PunkicCyborg on September 01, 2012, 02:37:46 PM
Bernie you are cool guy and we all get hot headed even me :P I think you pulled back when it started going down to shits-ville so i hope X-ray can meet ya half way as this is just silly. Hey it's between you 2 so tell me to f@ckoff anytime but I hope things cool down between yas.... I host groups hugs on Sunday :P
The ball is kind of in Xrays court, though I think at this point its more then just Bernie he may want to make amends with. Hes supposed to have some "list of 4" or something going. Its up to him either way.
List of 4? ......just silly... Let's have a look at the topic title again... Micheal Jackson. Someone change it to Swiss is a dick and we can have some real fun.
Yeah I guess its supposed to be Bernie and Arkhan and a couple others. Maybe its a list of 5 and I'm on there too lol. Who knows. Just silly.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Xray on September 01, 2012, 07:22:28 PM
Me and Bernie made things right between ourselves via pm. He initiated it, props to him for that. I have said all I needed to say on this subject, my opinions are known and won't be changed.
I respect the rights of others to differ, and admit there isn't a literal "smoking gun" that conclusively proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that he was a preteen ass raper. Now I'm just waiting for a "Was Hitler really such a bad guy" thread to really get things going !
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: ProfessorProfessorson on September 01, 2012, 07:42:54 PM
Me and Bernie made things right between ourselves via pm. He initiated it, props to him for that. I have said all I needed to say on this subject, my opinions are known and won't be changed.
I respect the rights of others to differ, and admit there isn't a literal "smoking gun" that conclusively proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that he was a preteen ass raper. Now I'm just waiting for a "Was Hitler really such a bad guy" thread to really get things going !
Thats good to hear.
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Tatsujin on September 01, 2012, 08:30:40 PM
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Arkhan on September 02, 2012, 02:05:16 PM
Regal Sin finally made a post that makes sense.
f*ck!
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: Drakon on September 10, 2012, 03:48:07 AM
*bump* I've always been a fan. Some of his outfits and dance move (crotch grabbing) weren't my taste. Also mentally he seemed to be disconnected from reality. But I love his singing and dancing!
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: NightWolve on September 10, 2012, 02:05:44 PM
I'd like to just remember him like this... the 1984 Jackson before it all went downhill...
Title: Re: Michael Jackson
Post by: RegalSin on September 10, 2012, 03:35:29 PM
Jackson downfall hit, once he gave into the paparazzi and almost had his kid fall off the ledge. Then with the court cases, every young person who never embarrassed him started throwing terms out their, that he was never.