PCEngineFans.com - The PC Engine and TurboGrafx-16 Community Forum
NEC TG-16/TE/TurboDuo => TG-16/TE/TurboDuo Discussion => Topic started by: bozo55 on July 05, 2015, 09:05:27 AM
-
Just curious really.
-
The story goes that before launch, NEC manufactured way more than they would ever sell. So it is unlikely.
-
The story goes that before launch, NEC manufactured way more than they would ever sell. So it is unlikely.
I see. I'm a bit disappointed that NEC used Taicon caps in the US Turbos. Didn't the PCE's use Rubycons?
-
The story goes that before launch, NEC manufactured way more than they would ever sell. So it is unlikely.
I see. I'm a bit disappointed that NEC used Taicon caps in the US Turbos. Didn't the PCE's use Rubycons?
I don't know, but I do know that there was a revision used in the Coregrafx and SuperGrafx, which fixed a crucial audio bug and those systems are capable of much higher quality samples.
-
The story goes that before launch, NEC manufactured way more than they would ever sell. So it is unlikely.
I see. I'm a bit disappointed that NEC used Taicon caps in the US Turbos. Didn't the PCE's use Rubycons?
Why would you be concerned about the caps on the Turbo? I have never seen an instance of bad caps on them.
-
The story goes that before launch, NEC manufactured way more than they would ever sell. So it is unlikely.
I see. I'm a bit disappointed that NEC used Taicon caps in the US Turbos. Didn't the PCE's use Rubycons?
Why would you be concerned about the caps on the Turbo? I have never seen an instance of bad caps on them.
Turbo Express
-
Board revision for teh rarez gloss Turbob? :lol:
-
The story goes that before launch, NEC manufactured way more than they would ever sell. So it is unlikely.
I see. I'm a bit disappointed that NEC used Taicon caps in the US Turbos. Didn't the PCE's use Rubycons?
Why would you be concerned about the caps on the Turbo? I have never seen an instance of bad caps on them.
Turbo Express
We are talking about the TG-16 though.