PCEngineFans.com - The PC Engine and TurboGrafx-16 Community Forum
NEC PC-Engine/SuperGrafx => PC Engine/SuperGrafx Discussion => Topic started by: Magister on February 05, 2017, 11:22:22 AM
-
Always enjoyed the NES version back when it came out. Always been a fan of the DD games, except for the third one. That one was clearly made just to milk you of your quarters. Double Dragon was the second arcade machine that I bought when I started collecting them. Just got done playing DD2 for the PC Engine and I have to say I enjoyed it a lot more than the NES version. It was easy for sure. Made it though the game on my first try. But I have to say I like how the game handles and looks. And the cut scenes just make the game even better. Looking back at who made DD2 for the NES, Acclaim was never really good at making great games. They made good games, but nothing I can remember that I would call great. Now Sunsoft on the other hand, they made great NES games.
-
Is that even a fair comparison? It's an NES game against a 16 bit CD game which is a remake of said NES game... That's like comparing the original Metroid to Metroid Zero Mission, yeah the remake is easier, but it's so much better than the original that you don't wanna go back to the original when you play the remake (unless you're a glutton for punishment)
Okay okay, SOME people might prefer the NES game, but this is a forum for PC engine fans, I imagine most people over here are going to prefer the PC engine remake, me included, that game rocks!
Also yeah, Sunsoft rocks! They were one of the best developers for the NES, way up there with Hudson, Natsume and Konami, Acclaim isn't even worth the comparison...
-
Acclaim was more of a publisher who licensed games from other distributors or developers, like Double Dragon II for NES/Famicom, which was made by Technos.
-
I really like the PC Engine version more than the NES version
-
Nes for me. I really don't like the music on the pce.
-
Okay okay, SOME people might prefer the NES game, but this is a forum for PC engine fans, I imagine most people over here are going to prefer the PC engine remake, me included, that game rocks!
Not the case with the Ninja Ryuukenden(PC-Engine) Vs. Ninja Gaiden(NES) thread. And just because it's a CD game doesn't always make it a better game.
-
Acclaim was more of a publisher who licensed games from other distributors or developers, like Double Dragon II for NES/Famicom, which was made by Technos.
Fair Enough. They published a lot of shitty games then. Swords and Serpents. Ugh. ](*,)
-
... ooookayyy, so what's with the rambling and the mention of Sunsoft? Double Dragon II NES is a Technos game, and the PCE-CD version was developed by KID, and published by NAXAT.
-
Is that even a fair comparison? It's an NES game against a 16 bit CD game which is a remake of said NES game... That's like comparing the original Metroid to Metroid Zero Mission, yeah the remake is easier, but it's so much better than the original that you don't wanna go back to the original when you play the remake (unless you're a glutton for punishment)
Okay okay, SOME people might prefer the NES game, but this is a forum for PC engine fans, I imagine most people over here are going to prefer the PC engine remake, me included, that game rocks!
Also yeah, Sunsoft rocks! They were one of the best developers for the NES, way up there with Hudson, Natsume and Konami, Acclaim isn't even worth the comparison...
i think it's a fair comparison, unlike the mega cd with added graphical features, the pc engine cd rom doesn't really additional graphical features, only minor memory advantages ( presuming) and cd quality soundtrack, thus, freeing the sound channels for additional sound effects, it's noted that the Pc engine super cd rom, is not too dissimilar to Famicom disk drive, plus the era is quite close.
-
... ooookayyy, so what's with the rambling and the mention of Sunsoft? Double Dragon II NES is a Technos game, and the PCE-CD version was developed by KID, and published by NAXAT.
what other pc engine games was developed by kid
-
double dragon 2 on the pc engine cd rom, has quite a few advantages over the NES version, even though it looks a bit goofy looking,
3 enemy characters and 2 player character (i can remember if 4 enemy characters at once) on pc engine cd rom, but the NES version is only 2 enemy characters and 2 player character at the same time
much faster gameplay than NES version
better cut scenes
But the NES version has a few more characters, ie, the Ninja is on the NES one, but not on the pc engine cd rom version ( strangely on the hidden menu of characters though)
-
Okay okay, SOME people might prefer the NES game, but this is a forum for PC engine fans, I imagine most people over here are going to prefer the PC engine remake, me included, that game rocks!
Not the case with the Ninja Ryuukenden(PC-Engine) Vs. Ninja Gaiden(NES) thread. And just because it's a CD game doesn't always make it a better game.
That one was pretty evenly split though wasn't it? The problem with Ninja Ryuukenden on the PC engine is that it has a couple of glaring flaws that Double Dragon 2 doesn't have, thus making the comparison a little closer...
i think it's a fair comparison, unlike the mega cd with added graphical features, the pc engine cd rom doesn't really additional graphical features, only minor memory advantages ( presuming) and cd quality soundtrack, thus, freeing the sound channels for additional sound effects, it's noted that the Pc engine super cd rom, is not too dissimilar to Famicom disk drive, plus the era is quite close.
The PC engine is still far superior hardware with or without the CD add-on, but the CD does add the ability to store a heck of a lot more data and play redbook music so that's a bonus...
Also, the fact that the PC engine CD only adds an ADPCM channel and extra memory to the system is what makes it all the more impressive than the Sega CD, the CPU and Graphics Processors that are handling Sapphire are the same CPU and Graphics Processors that handled Keith Courage and Bikkuriman World way back when, unlike on the Mega CD which is pretty much a whole other system attached to the Mega Drive...
Well guess what Sega? The Turbo CD doesn't need a whole new CPU or an extra power supply to make a better version of Lords of Thunder ;3
-
PCE version all the way.
-
I like the PCE music a lot! So yeah, definitely my version of choice. Also yes, much easier to control.
-
That one was pretty evenly split though wasn't it? The problem with Ninja Ryuukenden on the PC engine is that it has a couple of glaring flaws that Double Dragon 2 doesn't have, thus making the comparison a little closer...
It was close. But more people leaned towards the NES version. But that might have just been because they grew up playing the NES version first.
-
In my humble opinion, PCE > NES port of DD2. The reason being, the PCE port is just more capable. More colors, CD Quality music, intros and cut-scenes, etc. It's not that the NES port is bad, it's just that it's hamstrung by the physical limitations of the NES. Had the PCE port been butchered, like the game Golden Axe for example, then I'd agree the NES version wins hands down.
-
The PCE Port is better because it is HOT WILD.
-
I like the PCE version, but there is something infinitely better about the aesthetics of the NES version.
Now, to be fair, I played the hell out of the NES version and it really is one of my faves...so I might be biased.
Even really annoying parts in the NES game (e.g. the bricks that suddenly slide out of the wall...all the tricky jumping)...even that can't stop me from loving the NES version.
That said, I enjoy the PCE version and I had an epiphany, many moons ago, that the soundtrack is an under-appreciated element of the PCE port.
-
I like the PCE version, but there is something infinitely better about the aesthetics of the NES version.
That something is simply that the NES sprites are better-drawn.
I am surprised (though considering the forum, I probably shouldn't be) that for all the talk about how better the PCE version looks, no one mentions how the sprites just look... silly or worse than the arcade (or even NES) counterparts. Just compare how Burnov is drawn:
(http://www.co-optimus.com/images/upload/image/Double-Dragon-2-PCE-2.jpg)
(http://www.vizzed.com/vizzedboard/retro/user_screenshots/saves15/157740/NES--Double Dragon II The Revenge_Mar26 16_36_45.png)
The spritework is inconsistent and in some cases (like above) a little amateurish. Bigger with more colors =/= better.
That being said, despite its looks (cutscenes aside) the PCE remake is still a very good game, though imo the NES port plays a little bit better and it is possible to chain more attacks together for combos (there's a little bit of downtime that makes all the difference in this version).
-
I like the PCE version, but there is something infinitely better about the aesthetics of the NES version.
That something is simply that the NES sprites are better-drawn.
I am surprised (though considering the forum, I probably shouldn't be) that for all the talk about how better the PCE version looks, no one mentions how the sprites just look... silly or worse than the arcade (or even NES) counterparts. Just compare how Burnov is drawn:
(http://www.co-optimus.com/images/upload/image/Double-Dragon-2-PCE-2.jpg)
(http://www.vizzed.com/vizzedboard/retro/user_screenshots/saves15/157740/NES--Double Dragon II The Revenge_Mar26 16_36_45.png)
The spritework is inconsistent and in some cases (like above) a little amateurish. Bigger with more colors =/= better.
That being said, despite its looks (cutscenes aside) the PCE remake is still a very good game, though imo the NES port plays a little bit better and it is possible to chain more attacks together for combos (there's a little bit of downtime that makes all the difference in this version).
yes, it's goofy looking, but the gameplay is much better than the NES, the point being, though it's good, does it justify the high price for the pc engine version of this game?, now that's hard question
-
does it justify the high price for the pc engine version of this game?, now that's hard question
Hell to the no. eBay sellers are on crack.
-
PC-Engine version. All. Day. Long.
It's like, the only decent scrolling beat-em-up on the system.
-
does it justify the high price for the pc engine version of this game?, now that's hard question
Hell to the no. eBay sellers are on crack.
its noted that it's not cheap in japan either, quite a rare game
http://page9.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction/k200871677
-
To be fair, that auction has no bids on it yet, but it's not necessarily out of line with recent sales, which have been in the 7500-12,000 yen range.
I paid 3200 yen for a copy in 2010: looks like it has escalated in price since then.
-
To be fair, that auction has no bids on it yet, but it's not necessarily out of line with recent sales, which have been in the 7500-12,000 yen range.
I paid 3200 yen for a copy in 2010: looks like it has escalated in price since then.
(http://junk.tg-16.com/images/why_me_pce.jpg)
Q: Why post this?
A: Hot. Wild.
-
hot hot hot hot wild. HOT WILD.
"Good Evening!"
I love both games, I think the PCE game is an overall easier game, but the complete product of the NES game makes it a slightly better game. I want to say that I conquered DD2 on PCE the very first time I played it.
NES DD2 > PCE DD2 > Arcade Original
Odd?
-
They say the sea is cold...
http://junk.tg-16.com/audio/Double_Dragon_II/Track08.mp3
Hot.
Wild.
I would love to hear NES, with samples, pumping out a rendition of that unique PCE track.
-
The spritework is inconsistent and in some cases (like above) a little amateurish. Bigger with more colors =/= better.
That being said, despite its looks (cutscenes aside) the PCE remake is still a very good game, though imo the NES port plays a little bit better and it is possible to chain more attacks together for combos (there's a little bit of downtime that makes all the difference in this version).
Double Dragon games have always had fugly sprites and the NES version isn't great itself, even if it was well done considering the source material and target platform.
With that said, I'm not a fan of any version of DDII and the player sprites in particular have always been a turn off for me. But it's mostly a color issue, as like most PCE games, the developer didn't make good use of the console's color potential.
Here's what a color hack can do, changing nothing but the existing palette and not changing any pixels or moving any pixel's color to one not already shared with it:
(http://superpcenginegrafx.net/misc/dd2s2.gif)
(http://superpcenginegrafx.net/misc/dd2s1.gif)
(http://superpcenginegrafx.net/misc/dd2s1a.gif)
-
The spritework is inconsistent and in some cases (like above) a little amateurish. Bigger with more colors =/= better.
That being said, despite its looks (cutscenes aside) the PCE remake is still a very good game, though imo the NES port plays a little bit better and it is possible to chain more attacks together for combos (there's a little bit of downtime that makes all the difference in this version).
Double Dragon games have always had fugly sprites and the NES version isn't great itself, even if it was well done considering the source material and target platform.
With that said, I'm not a fan of any version of DDII and the player sprites in particular have always been a turn off for me. But it's mostly a color issue, as like most PCE games, the developer didn't make good use of the console's color potential.
Here's what a color hack can do, changing nothing but the existing palette and not changing any pixels or moving any pixel's color to one not already shared with it:
(http://superpcenginegrafx.net/misc/dd2s2.gif)
(http://superpcenginegrafx.net/misc/dd2s1.gif)
(http://superpcenginegrafx.net/misc/dd2s1a.gif)
This I like...
-
Jimmy:
(http://superpcenginegrafx.net/misc/dd2s4.gif)(http://superpcenginegrafx.net/misc/dd2s3.gif)(http://superpcenginegrafx.net/misc/dd2s1b.gif)
(http://superpcenginegrafx.net/misc/dd2s6.png)(http://superpcenginegrafx.net/misc/dd2s6a.png)
-
Damn! I love the new and improved Bimmy!