Philips came up with something for gaming that somebody else wanted ? I dunno... Like someone in the article said, Nintendo's desire for motion control technology goes way back to this ole thing:

Not to get in Nintendo's tank in this case, but I guess I would lean on this being bullshit. Still, for a court to have made a judgement in Philips' favor if the merits were totally bogus, it's curious. Judges and courts don't deserve auto-respect that they're afforded of course, they can be corrupt as any other political body of government, so I would really have to look at the case to tell for sure.
There was this link by someone in there too, Nintendo having specifically invested in another company that specialized in motion control tech in 2001:
http://www.gamecubicle.com/news-nintendo_gyration.htm