Here you are dead wrong. Everything was hypothetical.
"It doesn't have to be exclusive, but the PS4 has few exclusives, than it's hardly worth picking up in favor of say Xbox One or (more likely) PC."
I'm not sure how that's obviously meant as a hypothetical, but whatever you say professor.
I was defending the criteria of exclusives in deciding a console, which you called bullshit for but still haven't been able, nor can you be able, of pointing out why it's bullshit.
Like I already said, I think it's bullshit to claim a system isn't worth owning based on it's lack of exclusives. If somebody only wants to play CoD, FIFA, GTA, etc., then any one of the systems is worth owning, and the buyer should decide on price/controller preference/etc.
Exclusives are a valid point to consider, of course, but it's just one factor among many.
However, I do know it's downright laughable you think the PC has less exclusives than either of those two consoles. Hilarious.
I freely admit to not following PC gaming all that closely (or much of any new stuff, really), so I was basing that mostly off what I see in stores, in adverts, and on GoG or Steam. The vast majority of those titles are either cross platform or rehashes of old PC games that may or may not have been ported all over the place back in the day.
That's a hypothetical. You should also have learned those in 4th grade. I think you should go back and carefully reread the arguments here. Make sure you're not confusing me with some other argument you had last year.
I figured it out! You don't know the definition of the word if, do you?
It's so fun getting you riled up. Easy too.
Here's a game for OP to pre-order: Ys VIII. It's all you really need.
