Author Topic: question about copyright law of game musics  (Read 318 times)

Tatsujin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12311
question about copyright law of game musics
« on: February 13, 2008, 01:32:27 PM »
i have a question about how the international law conderning musics in video games are copyright protected?

become those musics time-barred somewhen?
does it depends, how the music was registered back the?
does it depends, if it's about old chip tune music or red book audio?
does the copy right belong to the composer or the company which has/had the game rights? and if the company doesn't exist anymore, what happens then?

i think it differ case by case, how the contract was closed back then. but any thoughts or facts about this issue would be appreciated :)
www.pcedaisakusen.net
the home of your individual PC Engine collection!!
PCE Games coundown: 690/737 (47 to go or 93.6% clear)
PCE Shmups countdown: 111/111 (all clear!!)
Sega does what Nintendon't, but only NEC does better than both together!^^

Hobo Xiphas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 529
Re: question about copyright law of game musics
« Reply #1 on: February 13, 2008, 03:04:21 PM »
I am not a copyright lawyer but I play one in Phoenix Wright.

Quote from: Tatsujin
become those musics time-barred somewhen?

I'm having trouble trying to figure out what you mean, but yeah, it will eventually become public domain.  75 years or so in da US, probably the same or less in Japan.

Quote from: Tatsujin
does it depends, how the music was registered back the?

Nah, international copyright law has been pretty static since video games have been around

Quote from: Tatsujin
does it depends, if it's about old chip tune music or red book audio?

No.  What does depend is if a musician licensed their work to the game company, but kept the rights to it.

Quote from: Tatsujin
does the copy right belong to the composer or the company which has/had the game rights?

Depends on the circumstances.  99% of the time, especially with older games, I'd say it belongs to the same guys who own the game.

Quote from: Tatsujin
and if the company doesn't exist anymore, what happens then?

Whoever bought the company owns the rights.  If no one bought the company, then it might either revert to the original creators or be considered public domain depending on the country.

Kitsunexus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3911
Re: question about copyright law of game musics
« Reply #2 on: February 13, 2008, 06:43:48 PM »
Of course, some a$$holes don't care about chiptune music, ie: Timbaland.  :evil:
 

FM-77

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2180
Re: question about copyright law of game musics
« Reply #3 on: February 14, 2008, 05:05:46 AM »
Be a proud pirate and steal all the music you can.

guyjin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3896
Re: question about copyright law of game musics
« Reply #4 on: February 14, 2008, 08:32:14 AM »
Tatsujin is clearly a Ninja, and not a pirate.  8)
"Fun is a strong word." - SNK
"Today, people do all kind of shit." - Tatsujin

Game and Watch Kirby

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 344
Re: question about copyright law of game musics
« Reply #5 on: February 17, 2008, 06:07:14 PM »
Tatsujin is clearly a Ninja, and not a pirate.  8)

So, too, is Joe Redifer, but who is the cooler and better ninja? That we may never know 8).

To give an extension on this knowledge, using video game music for works created by yourself without much permission are safe to use for, in example, videos uploaded to the Internet. Many videos on YouTube, as well as possibly MySpace, are good evidence of this (which, in corresponding, refer to some of mine).
"Here comes a new challenger! Four new contestants stepped into the Audio Deathmatch ring today. You be the judge as these juggernauts battle it out in a fight to the finish!" - A segment of the August 3, 2006 update of SuperPCEngineGrafx.com

Hobo Xiphas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 529
Re: question about copyright law of game musics
« Reply #6 on: February 22, 2008, 07:19:32 PM »
YouTube is not a good example to use for backing up copyright claims.

99% of the stuff on there technically violates someone's copyright.