Author Topic: Why wasn't SF II ported..  (Read 414 times)

Tatsujin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12311
Why wasn't SF II ported..
« on: July 25, 2009, 07:49:46 AM »
..in fullscreen for the all the 16-bitter?

you actually can see it on every port of street fighter II on any 16 bit platform like SFC, PCE, MD, the black bars above und below.

but why is it so? what was the reason for the horizontal cuts?

the PAL version was even a step worse, since it had the standard 100 black lines from NTSC to PAL, added to the original black bars, which cutted off almost 1/3 of the screen  :lol: that was nooo fun.
www.pcedaisakusen.net
the home of your individual PC Engine collection!!
PCE Games coundown: 690/737 (47 to go or 93.6% clear)
PCE Shmups countdown: 111/111 (all clear!!)
Sega does what Nintendon't, but only NEC does better than both together!^^

Arkhan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14142
  • Fuck Elmer.
    • Incessant Negativity Software
Re: Why wasn't SF II ported..
« Reply #1 on: July 25, 2009, 07:52:41 AM »
I think its to give it a wide screen effect!
[Fri 19:34]<nectarsis> been wanting to try that one for awhile now Ope
[Fri 19:33]<Opethian> l;ol huge dong

I'm a max level Forum Warrior.  I'm immortal.
If you're not ready to defend your claims, don't post em.

Tatsujin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12311
Re: Why wasn't SF II ported..
« Reply #2 on: July 25, 2009, 07:59:51 AM »
ROFFEL
www.pcedaisakusen.net
the home of your individual PC Engine collection!!
PCE Games coundown: 690/737 (47 to go or 93.6% clear)
PCE Shmups countdown: 111/111 (all clear!!)
Sega does what Nintendon't, but only NEC does better than both together!^^

Grandmaster

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 36
Re: Why wasn't SF II ported..
« Reply #3 on: July 25, 2009, 01:11:14 PM »
perhaps it was a way for capcom to fit the game on those home systems, saving the game's overall integrity from the arcade version.

omotai

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 27
Re: Why wasn't SF II ported..
« Reply #4 on: July 26, 2009, 03:50:59 PM »
Capcom arcade games ran at a funky resolution, and they ported them like that instead of cutting off part of the screen or squishing it into TV aspect ratio.

Tatsujin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12311
Re: Why wasn't SF II ported..
« Reply #5 on: July 26, 2009, 04:15:05 PM »
but non of 'em were straight conversions, all of em were redrawn. so i don't see the point of make 'em smaller than necessary?
www.pcedaisakusen.net
the home of your individual PC Engine collection!!
PCE Games coundown: 690/737 (47 to go or 93.6% clear)
PCE Shmups countdown: 111/111 (all clear!!)
Sega does what Nintendon't, but only NEC does better than both together!^^

SuperDeadite

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2096
Re: Why wasn't SF II ported..
« Reply #6 on: July 26, 2009, 07:06:25 PM »
Well they were all based off of World Warrior on SFC right?  So they probably did it for some reason on SFC, and then just stayed lazy for the ports.
Stronger Than Your Average Deadite

Joe Redifer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
Re: Why wasn't SF II ported..
« Reply #7 on: July 26, 2009, 08:09:06 PM »
The arcade ran at the same aspect ratio as home game systems:  4:3.  The resolution was odd, but there was no need to letterbox it. Capcom never really put a lot of effort into home games except for the NES, I feel.

majors

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1347
  • Have cabs, will travel
Re: Why wasn't SF II ported..
« Reply #8 on: July 27, 2009, 01:03:16 PM »
The arcade ran at the same aspect ratio as home game systems:  4:3.  The resolution was odd, but there was no need to letterbox it.

The arcade may run on 4:3 monitor but it has bars also. The arcade owner may have adjusted the virt to expand the screen. I know CPS2 resolutions are not 4:3 (384x224), dunno about CPS1 of the top of my head.

It may have effected game mechanics if the screen was a different aspect/size so they "ported" it to be the same.
PCE Daisakusen RIP - "Booze should be a choice, not a privilege" -KCDC (The FP)
"The dumb are mostly intrigued by the drum"

nodtveidt

  • Guest
Re: Why wasn't SF II ported..
« Reply #9 on: August 13, 2009, 12:31:09 PM »
It may have effected game mechanics if the screen was a different aspect/size so they "ported" it to be the same.
I remember from playing SFII on the SNES that the letterboxing actually DID change the game mechanics...it was most noticeable in Vega's stage.

Tatsujin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12311
Re: Why wasn't SF II ported..
« Reply #10 on: August 13, 2009, 06:48:20 PM »
sure it does, but only in a bad way! N0 LB 4TW!
www.pcedaisakusen.net
the home of your individual PC Engine collection!!
PCE Games coundown: 690/737 (47 to go or 93.6% clear)
PCE Shmups countdown: 111/111 (all clear!!)
Sega does what Nintendon't, but only NEC does better than both together!^^

Black Tiger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11242
Re: Why wasn't SF II ported..
« Reply #11 on: August 14, 2009, 09:06:26 AM »
The arcade ran at the same aspect ratio as home game systems:  4:3.  The resolution was odd, but there was no need to letterbox it.

The arcade may run on 4:3 monitor but it has bars also. The arcade owner may have adjusted the virt to expand the screen. I know CPS2 resolutions are not 4:3 (384x224), dunno about CPS1 of the top of my head.

It may have effected game mechanics if the screen was a different aspect/size so they "ported" it to be the same.

All that I can think of is that you're assuming that games back then were meant to be stretched proportionately until the longer dimension touches the edges of the screen. It wasn't arcade operators fooling around with monitors, video signals were meant to fill screens and that's why everything looks so disproportionately wide in raw cps2 screen shots. Unless you see black bars in the screen shots, the game wasn't mean to have them.
http://www.superpcenginegrafx.net/forum

Active and drama free PC Engine forum