So I stand by my vote: SuperGrafx was their best console, on a technical level (IMHO).
You honestly think that the SuperGrafx is technically superior to the PC-FX?
<sigh>
No. That's not what I'm saying.
I'm saying, that in my opinion, the SuperGrafx was their best console.
That in as much as the SuperGrafx was a better contemporary to other "16-bit" graphics consoles than the PC-FX was to it's "32-bit" brethren.
I suppose my use of the word "technical" was misleading-- it was meant as an indicator of me judging it by the console's abilities and other inherent qualities as opposed to solely judging by it's available game library or it's market success. I voted SuperGrafx because of it's backwards compatibility with all PCE games and hardware peripherals, plus you get the added bonus of the mega-awesome SGX game titles. For me, the PC-FX loses because it's not nearly as cool and it doesn't provide compatibility with anything established in the previous "generation". The whole package seems just a tad lackluster for a "32-bit" system.
Look, this poll was screwed up from the beginning. The creator's intent was obviously to poll our preference in game libraries by medium (PCE CD, PCE HuCard, SuperGrafx HuCard, PC-FX CD). But because of the way the poll is presented, particularly the fact that it's called "NEC's Best Mother-f*ckin'
Console" and not "NEC's Best Ass-Kicking Game Library" this meaning was lost on some. Add to that the ultra-confusing choice of options to vote for.....
SuperGrafx was NEC's best console.
Create a new poll called "NEC's Best Game Library" and I'll vote differently.