« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8

Author Topic: PC Engine vs. Turbo Grafx-16  (Read 4560 times)

Joe Redifer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
PC Engine vs. Turbo Grafx-16
« Reply #75 on: September 05, 2006, 07:03:25 PM »
Quote from: "Steve"
I absolutely hated the genesis 1 aesthetics, including, but not limited to all the goofy text emblazoned on it.

But at least the early Genesis 1 was in high definition.  They wouldn't have put that on there if it weren't true!  I bet it can even do 1080p!

Quote from: "Steve"
Let me go on the record that model 1 SMS = lovely! (see my initial post for the reasons) while the redesined model 2 SMS = absolutely bland garbage.

Agreed 100%.
Logged

Keranu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9054
PC Engine vs. Turbo Grafx-16
« Reply #76 on: September 05, 2006, 08:44:15 PM »
Quote from: "Tatsujin"
yeah! just one of the freakest console designs ever created. PC Motor :lol:

Lets design a car that uses the Super Grafx as the engine. Hey, maybe we could use the TG16+CD as the flux capacitor also so our car can time travel! If that's the case, we better design the car as a DeLorean.
Logged
Quote from: Bonknuts
Adding PCE console specific layer on top of that, makes for an interesting challenge (no, not a reference to Ys II).

GUTS

  • Guest
PC Engine vs. Turbo Grafx-16
« Reply #77 on: September 05, 2006, 09:30:04 PM »
That's why I liked the model 1 Genesis/CD combo, it looked like stacked stereo components.  Maybe it's because I never had any good stereo equipment when I was young, but for some reason that stacked look was what high end electronics should look like in my mind.

The original Master System was pretty cool looking, I definitely agree.
Logged

Keranu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9054
PC Engine vs. Turbo Grafx-16
« Reply #78 on: September 05, 2006, 09:32:18 PM »
Original Master System design rocks.
Logged
Quote from: Bonknuts
Adding PCE console specific layer on top of that, makes for an interesting challenge (no, not a reference to Ys II).

Tatsujin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12311
PC Engine vs. Turbo Grafx-16
« Reply #79 on: September 05, 2006, 10:18:29 PM »
SMS rox, but the mark III even more :D
Logged
www.pcedaisakusen.net
the home of your individual PC Engine collection!!
PCE Games coundown: 690/737 (47 to go or 93.6% clear)
PCE Shmups countdown: 111/111 (all clear!!)
Sega does what Nintendon't, but only NEC does better than both together!^^

FM-77

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2180
PC Engine vs. Turbo Grafx-16
« Reply #80 on: September 06, 2006, 02:50:47 AM »
Master System rocks I agree, but it isn't exactly pretty, but I like it anyway. I only think about one thing when I see one: Ys.  :lol:
Logged

esteban

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24063
PC Engine vs. Turbo Grafx-16
« Reply #81 on: September 06, 2006, 06:47:12 PM »
Quote from: "GUTS"
That's why I liked the model 1 Genesis/CD combo, it looked like stacked stereo components.  Maybe it's because I never had any good stereo equipment when I was young, but for some reason that stacked look was what high end electronics should look like in my mind.
OK, I see where you are coming from :). As a peace offering, let me say that Genny+CD definitely succeeded in fostering the image in question  ("stacked stereo components") and I'll leave it at that.

I really am not a Genny hater, despite my earlier tirades :).

Quote from: "Joe"
Quote from: "Steve"
Steve wrote:
I absolutely hated the genesis 1 aesthetics, including, but not limited to all the goofy text emblazoned on it.


But at least the early Genesis 1 was in high definition. They wouldn't have put that on there if it weren't true! I bet it can even do 1080p!
:)

I really don't loathe the Genny's aesthetics... I just have fun teasing folks while discussing TG-16's unappreciated qualities :).
Logged
  |    | 

Vanquish

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 83
PC Engine vs. Turbo Grafx-16
« Reply #82 on: September 08, 2006, 04:32:26 AM »
Did you know that we had an european turbografx? It was called Turbografx, but without the "16".
It had no aceptation at all and in the early 90s you could find it for about 30€ brand new. Now people pay about 90€ for these.
They include Blanzing Lazers, rf cable, av cable and ac adaptor. And i want one.
IT is like the TG16 but with a lighter colour. go to ebay and look for a picture of it.
I think it looks nicer than the TG16, sorry :P

BTW the PCE looks great, specially if it is clear white and it is not yellowed.
Logged

FM-77

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2180
PC Engine vs. Turbo Grafx-16
« Reply #83 on: September 08, 2006, 04:53:00 AM »
You sure the PAL unit includes Blazing Lazers? Yeah I posted a picture of one here (no that was NFGames) a while ago.

Logged

Vanquish

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 83
PC Engine vs. Turbo Grafx-16
« Reply #84 on: September 08, 2006, 07:47:04 AM »
yeah it came with blazing lazers, but people on ebay use to keep them, sell them console and then sell the game for more $$$  :cry:
Logged

guyjin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3896
PC Engine vs. Turbo Grafx-16
« Reply #85 on: September 08, 2006, 01:20:12 PM »
I see they had the sense to put a game on the cover of the box (yay R-type!)

Unlike the US box...

is that the original box, or is there another? (suprisingly hard to find a TG16 box pic...)
Logged
"Fun is a strong word." - SNK
"Today, people do all kind of shit." - Tatsujin

Keranu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9054
PC Engine vs. Turbo Grafx-16
« Reply #86 on: September 08, 2006, 06:48:45 PM »
When I first saw the TG16 box with that dude's face on it, I thought it was pretty scary, seriously :D . But now I love seeing it and I really should get a boxed TG16 someday, if only just for that box!
Logged
Quote from: Bonknuts
Adding PCE console specific layer on top of that, makes for an interesting challenge (no, not a reference to Ys II).

Joe Redifer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
PC Engine vs. Turbo Grafx-16
« Reply #87 on: September 08, 2006, 06:52:46 PM »
That dude is awesome.  He graces my TG-16 box.  He watches me play games, and he is obviously happy about it.  I mean god damn!
Logged

Keranu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9054
PC Engine vs. Turbo Grafx-16
« Reply #88 on: September 08, 2006, 07:21:54 PM »
See man, your post is only making me want to get one even more now! :D Really, I shouldn't be spending money on more hardware, especially when I already have a Duo and Express so I can already play those games!
Logged
Quote from: Bonknuts
Adding PCE console specific layer on top of that, makes for an interesting challenge (no, not a reference to Ys II).

Joe Redifer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
PC Engine vs. Turbo Grafx-16
« Reply #89 on: September 08, 2006, 08:27:32 PM »
I, for one, think it is hilariously awesome that you want to buy a TurboGrafx-16 in the box just because of that dude.  Granted, he is indeed quite the system-seller.  I'm not sure why he never got his own game.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8
« previous next »